SOC301H5 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Penology, Neoliberalism, Welfarism
Document Summary
That is (cid:455)ours fault (cid:455)ou did(cid:374)"t (cid:373)a(cid:454)i(cid:373)ize (cid:455)our pote(cid:374)tial, a(cid:374)d that (cid:455)ou did(cid:374)"t (cid:272)hose to li(cid:448)e a (cid:374)or(cid:373)al life. That the state steers, but we do the row. Its up to us to plan for our future. Our choice becomes the way we understand (cid:272)ri(cid:373)e. e(cid:373)po(cid:449)er(cid:373)e(cid:374)t that (cid:455)ou ha(cid:448)e to a(cid:272)tualise (cid:455)our o(cid:449)(cid:374) pote(cid:374)tial: risk i(cid:374)stitutio(cid:374)s start thi(cid:374)ki(cid:374)g a(cid:271)out risk. E(cid:448)er(cid:455)o(cid:374)e"s at risk for so(cid:373)ethi(cid:374)g. you assess whose likely to reoffend. Its rooted on this idea that crime is a social fact and that it is not solvable: can distinguish from punitive turn. Does(cid:374)"t see(cid:373) like everyone was convinced it was reforming. Doob and webster: harsh sounding few large effects. That a lot of these legislations sound very harsh but the(cid:455)"re o(cid:374)l(cid:455) talki(cid:374)g a(cid:271)out s(cid:373)aller (cid:374)u(cid:373)(cid:271)ers. We have a lot more diverse purposes, that idea that nothing works. There is no crisis of principle: low enthusiasm for harshing sentencing , that crime is not the central platform.
