POL326Y1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: United States House Committee On Rules, New Deal Coalition, Fasttrack

48 views5 pages
14 Dec 2016
Currently: Division of power between Congress and Obama re: Foreign Policy
US trade under firm control of Congress; however, over the last few decades things have changed
somewhat; Congress extremely inefficient in addition to being a system that represents various
constituents and interests; allows a small minority to block anything; if this arrangement is dominant in
determining trade policy, how can the US engage in free trade? Keeping in mind that free trade has
winners and losers; Also, Congress has for the most part been protectionist; in the last couple of
decades US engaged in a couple free trade agreements (NAFTA for instance); how? Congress delegated
authority to executive branch known as giving the president fast-track authority; what that means that
Congress recognized its inability of making free-tade aageets; hile US poli geeal ope doo
policy, on specifics not so much; Nixon: came up with fast-track authority allowing president to
negotiate with foreign powers and submit them to Congress, simply vote it up or down without having
the authority to amend it;
Under such arrangement, a number of free-trade agreements signed; since 2003 that arrangement has
expired; unlikely that Trans-Pacific Partnership to pass without fast-track authority; certain countries
ioled like Idoesia ad Vieta hae eteel lo ages, ad goes agaist etai Aeias
Canada part of the talks; Harper in favour of it; in Canada, it will likely pass;
Seymour Hirsch: Execution of Osama bin Laden;
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Discussion of US Constitution: continued…
- In order to understanding the nature of US FP, need to understanding the Constitution doc;
- Connecticut Compromise the current Constitution;
- Other means, to leave the doc relatively ambiguous;
- As such, the reader reads it based on their own interpretations;
- Constitution: three Articles;
- Article 1: powers of Congress as the Legislative Brach; framers pointed out, it is the most
dangerous branch (James Madison); if the government becomes tyrannical it is through the law
making branch; to avoid such, this branch to be designed to avoid the tyranny of majority; the
rectification of economic inequality to infringe on minority rights; consequently this branch to
be divided into two institutions: House of Reps based on Congress districts roughly equal in size
in terms of population but relatively small and each of them elect one member for a total of 435
for two year terms to make them as accountable as possible to the electorate; as such, the most
democratic branch of Congress; US SENATE: originally appointed; today also elected on the basis
of two Senators per state regardless of population; parcel of it also that the US system of
government based on regional representative; to represent the interests of its constituents not
the ideology of political parties; it is important as framers did not anticipate political parties; US
government designed to prevent rise of powerful parties; why parties rise? As a process of the
ratification of the Constitution; those opposed becoming anti-Federalist and those in favour the
Federalists; however, parties inherently stayed weak; one reason, each elections for each
houses are separate elections; the local party organizations determine who runs; parties are
extremely decentralized; true for both houses and presidential elections; as such 50 separate
party organizations; not controlled in any direct way by any official in Washington;
IMPLICATIONS: Democratic Party; has existed since Civil War; did not reach a stage of real
power in American politics; their base of support Southern segregationists (as Lincoln was
Republican) and northern progressive and unions; that New Deal Coalition lasted until 1960s;
change of allegiances by LBG; ‘epulias sa the oppotuit ad Nios southern strategy to
chisel away the support of racists to Republicans; now Bible belt centre of Republican party and
those Democrats that remain in south are due to their independence from party line; in Canada
and most of Europe (except West German model) based on parliamentary system and party line;
West Germany and now Germany is a hybrid movement;
- What is true of House of Rep is less true of Senate only in the sense that Senate seen as more
elite (large constituents and 6 year terms); idea as an upper-chamber and a place where greater
amount of debate could take place; Senators because insulated from public pressure for a long
time are better positioned to vote their conscience; but basic idea of containing majority power
embedded in Senate in particular (contrary to House of Reps); debate restricted in the House of
Reps; in the Senate no House Rules Committee; reason is that it empowers small minorities that
are strongly opposed to certain bills by preventing them to come to vote; Filibuster? Intention is
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get OneClass Notes+

Unlimited access to class notes and textbook notes.

YearlyBest Value
75% OFF
$8 USD/m
$30 USD/m
You will be charged $96 USD upfront and auto renewed at the end of each cycle. You may cancel anytime under Payment Settings. For more information, see our Terms and Privacy.
Payments are encrypted using 256-bit SSL. Powered by Stripe.