Political Science 2237E Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Intellectual Virtue, The Good Life, Rationality

• School: Western University
• Department: Political Science
• Course: Political Science 2237E
• Professor: Richard Vande Wetering

Document Summary

If you thi(cid:374)k it"s all (cid:374)ature (cid:894)(cid:448)s (cid:374)urture(cid:895) the(cid:374) hu(cid:373)a(cid:374)s are (cid:271)or(cid:374) as they are. If you go all nurture, you believe humans are created, social construction. Plato (cid:449)ould (cid:271)e (cid:374)ear the (cid:374)ature side of the spe(cid:272)tru(cid:373) (cid:271)e(cid:272)ause he (cid:271)elie(cid:448)es that"s (cid:449)ho (cid:449)e are. Plato believes change is bad, normally goes in a bad direction. However, institutions affect who we are, according to plato. Aristotle, is more near the nature side than plato: aristotle claims we cannot escape biological sex or ethnicity, aristotle is concerned about observation, common sense, nature. What aristotle thinks is natural maybe just be accepted in our nature: ex: women are slaves. Aristotle"s politi(cid:272)al s(cid:272)ie(cid:374)(cid:272)e is li(cid:373)ited (cid:271)y his (cid:448)ersio(cid:374) of (cid:374)ature. Aristotle elevates the nature to what it means to be good. That we obey rationally when acting, highlighting obedience: human soul is divided into two sides. Orectic: lines up with appetitive/passion side, impulsiveness. Thinking rationally, deliberative, intellectual virtue, develops with experience and time.