Lecture #12: The British Empire in the 18th Century

5 Pages
135 Views

Department
History
Course Code
HISTORY 7A
Professor
Mark Peterson

This preview shows pages 1 and half of page 2. Sign up to view the full 5 pages of the document.
Description
Lecture #12: The British Empire in the 18 Century The Making of the Warfare State I. Remaking Government in British America A. The “Glorious Revolution” of 1688: Remaking British Government » Key Elements of the Glorious Revolution – Limited monarchy and Protestant succession – Regular parliaments – Bill of Rights – Limited religions toleration – Rule by ‘king in parliament’ – Ascendancy of the Whig party B. The Colonies and the Glorious Revolution » James’ assault on the colonial charters, and the creation of the ‘Dominion of New England’ – Combined Massachusetts with New Hampshire, etc. into one single unit that would be governed by his own appointed governor ∆ Wanted the entire government to be led by two military appointments ∆ Did something very different, because these places had for a long time been self-governing ∆ Dominion of New England completely undermined this – Also tried to eradicate poorer land owners – Undermined the religious freedom and the freedom of the people to give taxes to whichever church they wanted » Rebellions in several colonies (MA, NY, MD) – Angry with James’ Dominion of New England – Leaders of these colonies supported people coming in to arrest the appointed governors » Restoration and reorganization of colonial charters – William (James’ successor) was aware that pushing too hard against colonial liberties may continue the process of rebellion – Wanted a solid colonial backing for his precarious position on the throne – William (Dutch) had already been engaged in warfare with Louis XIV of France – Wanted to drive back Catholicism of Louis XIV – First to think about a role for the colonies – New colonial charter with a compromise ∆ Royal governor appointed by William ∆ Agreed there should be a representative of the people ∆ Allowed restoration of assemblies ∆ Beginning of greater organization in the ways colonies were run » Colonial ambiguity: crown or parliament? – There was an agreement within Britain itself that they would be ruling the colonies – However, this issue was never addressed: does parliament have over the colonies too ∆ King had been involved in the creation of the colonies, but parliament had not ∆ English now transformed to be conducted in agreement with king and parliament, so now it’s confused in the colonies ∆ Plagued the colonies all through the American revolution – Starting in about 1650, Parliament had created a system of regulating navigational trade (Navigation Acts) ∆ Fine for the colonies to trade with one another ∆ Fine for the colonies to trade directly with England ∆ Prohibit trade of the most valuable commodities between colonies and foreign empires  Economic theory ruled this idea: Mercantilism ≈ Limited amount of wealth in the world ≈ Various empires in nations of world competed with each other for that wealth ≈ Therefore, if you have a source of wealth you should keep it within your own empire and away from the hands of the enemy o Wealth can be used for military might o Military might can be used to gain control of enemy’s colonies ∆ This was kind of the only role of parliament in the colonies, nothing overseeing the everyday activities of colonies » Fundamental ambiguity in the system C. The structure of colonial governments: imperfect replicas of English government » King in England has a lot of power (power to appoint aristocrats and nobles) but this power is checked by the parliament (House of Lords and House of Commons) – Because the parliament can approve any kind of taxation the King wants, this gives parliament a lot of power as well » In the colonies, the leader of the colonies is like a king – Appointed by king/elected (most powerful figure in colony) – Under the leader is a council – Assembly elected by common people – Structural similarity that no one had planned » An excess of ‘democracy’ – ‘Democracy’: ruled by everyone – USA doesn’t have a direct democracy – people elect representatives who get to say something, but the common people cannot really give their opinions – Excess of democracy – lower houses in structure of government were actually quite strong. ∆ Better at representing the people than the parliament could for the people in England ∆ Assemblies quite large, and very vocal; contrasts with Britain’s House of Commons – only small number of people were allowed to vote by 18 century ∆ Quite easy for the crown to control parliament (bribery, etc.) so House of Commons relatively weak compared to Assembly in colonies » A missing aristocracy – In England, the aristocracy had the right to be in the parliament, and th
More Less
Unlock Document

Only pages 1 and half of page 2 are available for preview. Some parts have been intentionally blurred.

Unlock Document
You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version

Unlock Document

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit