BUS 205 Lecture Notes - Lecture 23: Res Ipsa Loquitur, Contributory Negligence, Punitive Damages

33 views2 pages
12 Oct 2018
School
Course
Professor

Document Summary

For the defendant to be liable, the type of harm must have been reasonably foreseeable. The facts imply that the defendant"s negligence caused the accident. Applies when: the harm normally would not have occurred without negligence, the defendant had exclusive control of the thing that caused the harm; and, the plaintiff had no role in causing the harm. Plaintiff must prove that he has been injured or that he has some kind of measurable losses. Compensation for pain and suffering, physical disfigurement, humiliation, embarrassment. Colorado"s non-economic cap is ,010 unless there is "permanent physical impairment". Colorado tort reform statute limits punitive damages to a 1:1 ratio with compensatory damages. U. s. supreme court has opined that a 9:1 ratio is ok. It would be more accurate to call them "damage doctrine": If the plaintiff is even slightly negligent, he/she recovers nothing. A plaintiff may generally recover even if he/she is partially responsible.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents