PHIL 270 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Coase Theorem, Lewis Carroll, Reflective Equilibrium

18 views2 pages
PHIL 270: Business Ethics
1.13 Lecture Notes Gaus The Idea ad Ideal of Capitalis
· Central question of private property
· Both a moral and economic question
· Ideal of capitalism maximally extensible feasible set of property rights pure form of capitalism
· Extent of ownership and range of ownership (how much, how long, and what can we own)
· Etet of oership iludes…
· Right to exclude people from using said property (consent is required)
o Realistically, a lot of it is implicit consent
· Right to compensation
· Right to destroy, waste, or modify
o Locke e a’t destro lad, ourseles, et. – God allows us to temporarily manage it
· What aout itelletual propert? should’t e sujeted to full oership rights, should e teporall liited
o Social reasons
o Either people would be expected to manage it poorly so limits should be put in place
· Rage of oership
o What can be owned? The atmosphere? Sex and drugs?
o Maybe only under certain conditions when people understand what is being exchanged
· Three justifications of private property, why is capitalism justified?
o Self-ownership
Self-ownership (like Nozick) although e o the orld’s resoures i oo, ou o our
body (sphere of liberty)
You also own your labor, which is a function of your body
By extension, we should own products of our labor
Locke was probably a theist, whereas modern Lockeans are mostly atheists
Locke: ownership over your body does not give you the right to destroy it because God gave us
our bodies to not mismanage it
Caot use other people’s odies i as that God ould disapproe of
Does’t ipl the etesie liertaria rights assoiated ith Loke
Modern Lockeans you can sell your organs, do extreme sports, potentially drugs
A deeply moral assumption a type of aio that is’t deried fro a set of preises
Side: What the tortoise said to Achilles? By Lewis Carrol
Reflective equilibrium start with initial assumptions and see what conclusions we get, and
then if we get contradictory and crazy stuff, then go back and revise/abandon the initial
premises
o Agency justification
Private property rights (legally recognized) give us a sphere in which we can experiment with
different ways of living
We need private property to do that
Unless you have property over yourself, you cannot develop your full personality
Immunity from predation right to have exit and entry options
Part of the identity is realized through the products of our labor even if that identity is
not the most socially efficient point
Someone owns a German deli, and their ownership over that business venture is
essential to his identity
Intellectual property often justified by social reasons, but also allows the rights over
propert that ight e etral to soeoe’s idetit
o Efficiency
Promotes welfare
Having the right to own private property knowing that your time and labor will generate a
product that you own allows for specialization and an incentive for profit/money
Instrumentally important
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents