ADJUS-121 Lecture Notes - Lecture 23: Lauria, Overt Act, Model Penal Code

7 views2 pages

Document Summary

The intent to have the target crime committed was required even if the target crime had a less culpable mental state. If the target crime required a mental state greater than intent, such as premeditation and deliberation, the state had to prove the greater mental state. If the defendant entered into an agreement knowing that a crime would take place as a result of that agreement, there is no specific intent and so no conspiracy. Mpc 5. 03(1) requires there be a purpose to promote or facilitate the crime, which is essentially the same as the traditional approach. On the issue of the target offense containing many elements, the drafters of the. Mpc purposely left if vague and dodged the issue. At common law, it was only necessary for the object of the conspiracy to be an unlawful act, not necessarily a crime.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions