POSC 4210 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Artificial Insemination, Urban Institute, Putative Father
10 Mar 2016
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
In cases involving paternity by estoppel, the courts have commonly expressed concern about the emotional and psychological harm to the child (as well as financial). 2: what if shannon wanted to free paul of his obligation, kelley v. kelley (virginia, 1994, shannon would not have that power, this is a state decision, not a personal. Post majority college support: in most states, a parent"s duty to support a child ends at the age of majority 18 in most states, but some states view college education as so integral a part of a child"s education. And if so, how should this be done: nash v. mulle (tennessee, 1993) revisited, solomon v. findley (arizona, 1991, johnson v. louis (iowa, 2002, curtis v. klein (pennsylvania, 1995) Al. (urban institute: who"s not paying and why, differences across states, how do states go about getting child support from non-custodial parents .
