MGMT 301 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Lesson Learned, Apa Style
6 May 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
MGMT 303: Grading Rubric for Reflective Commentary
Criteria
0-4 Points
Unacceptable
4-6 Points
Developing
6-8 Points
Competent
8-10 Points
Exemplary
1.Introduction:
Content is absent or no
clear direction
In part, content
lacks full
development and
direction
Provides
descriptive
information with
supportive
structure
Clearly outlines the
paper and
provides clear
direction for
reader.
2. Overview of Content
Content is absent or
understanding of the
concepts are not apparent
Attempts to
demonstrate
understanding of
the concepts, but
aspects are
confused or
underdeveloped
Exercises basic
analytical skills in
determining the
key change
concepts
Aptly synthesizes
the concepts of
management; uses
high level critical
analysis skills
supported with
convincing
arguments
3. Lesson Learned
Content is absent or does
not address the issues at
hand
Identifies, the
application of
methodologies in
practice; analysis is
incomplete or
unsubstantiated
Thoroughly
identifies and
compares the
application of
methodologies in
practice; reasoning
is defensible
Exhaustively
Identifies,
compares,
contrasts the
application of
methodologies in
practice; exercises
critical reflection
and conducts
comprehensive
analysis
4. Personal Action Plan
Content is absent or
information does not
demonstrate
understanding of the
subject area and no
application
Discussion is
incomplete; there is
limited analytical
support for
proposed personal
action to be taken
Thoughts and
ideas are clearly
expressed and
represent
reasonable plan of
action
Presents clear and
definitive
managerial
approaches that
represent original
thought as well as
best practices as
evidenced by the
literature
Comments:
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Document Summary
Content is absent or no clear direction: overview of content. Content is absent or understanding of the concepts are not apparent: lesson learned. Content is absent or does not address the issues at hand. In part, content lacks full development and direction. Attempts to demonstrate understanding of the concepts, but aspects are confused or underdeveloped. Exercises basic analytical skills in determining the key change concepts. Identifies, the application of methodologies in practice; analysis is incomplete or unsubstantiated. Thoroughly identifies and compares the application of methodologies in practice; reasoning is defensible: personal action plan. Content is absent or information does not demonstrate understanding of the subject area and no application. Discussion is incomplete; there is limited analytical support for proposed personal action to be taken. Thoughts and ideas are clearly expressed and represent reasonable plan of action. Clearly outlines the paper and provides clear direction for reader.
