ECON 1 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Tender Offer, Reverse Stock Split, Stock Split

7 views4 pages

rubywallaby21

4 Oct 2020

School

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

A corporation"s payout policy determines if and when it will distribute cash to its shareholders by issuing a dividend or undertaking a stock repurchase. To issue a dividend, the firm"s board of directors must authorize the amount per share that will be paid on the declaration date. The firm pays the dividend to all shareholders of record on the record date. Because it takes three business days for shares to be registered, only shareholders who purchase the stock at least three days prior to the record date receive the dividend. As a result, the date two business days prior to the record date is known as the exdividend date; anyone who purchases the stock on or after the ex-dividend date will not receive the dividend. Finally, on the payable (or distribution) date, which is generally about a month after the record date, the firm pays the dividend. Just before the ex-dividend date, the stock is said to trade cum-dividend.

Related Questions

In 2008, the Board of Directors and shareholders of Anheuser Busch agreed to be acquired by a Belgian Brewer (InBev). Prior to the merger, InBev made many pledges to AB regarding how the company would operate after the merger, how its employees would be treated, and so on. With some stipulations, the U.S. Government agreed to allow the merger.

Since the merger, InBev has laid off a significant number of Anheuser Busch employees, most of whom worked at the St. Louis headquarters. Where the merger created duplication of job duties, those being terminated have to-date been from AB, not InBev. There is a great deal of speculation and trepidation around the St. Louis area about the long-term fate of the remaining employees, as well as worry about how the new company will view the many and varied civic contributions the company has made to St. Louis and the many other U.S. areas in which it has operations.

View 1 - AB acted as a well-managed business that takes the actions necessary to remain competitive in a very competitive market. If AB had not approved the merger, its profits and stock price would have fallen, and investment capital would have fled the company. As difficult as the decision was, AB operates in a very competitive environment and owes its stockholders the best return it can provide.

View 2 - The decision to sell the company was both short-sighted and, ultimately, a bad business decision. Any short term benefits AB stockholders reaped from the merger will be more than offset by U.S. job losses, lower tax revenues for States and the U.S. Government, and damage to the U.S. communities in which the company operates. Employees whose employers are loyal to them during difficult times repay that loyalty to the company through hard work. Employees who view themselves as economic pawns to be added or discarded as needed will feel only a marginal commitment to the new AB and their work performance will reflect the negative opinion they hold of their employer.

Let's hear your thoughts. Don't just tell us what you think personally, but bring Managerial Economic theory to bear on this issue.

After reading the article, post substantive comments on the economic impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE TRUMP TAX CUTS

April 25, 2018

The Economic Impact of the Trump Tax Cuts

By Hilary Schmidt, International Banker

On December 22, US President Donald Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. The legislation is one of the most radical changes to fiscal policy the United States has undertaken in decades, with sweeping amendments implemented across the entire breadth of the tax code. Indeed, in his State of the Union Address, Trump called it the biggest tax cuts and reforms in American history. As such, its impact is likely to be felt throughout the economy for quite some time to come.

It is arguably the cut in a corporate tax that forms the centrepiece of this new legislation, with the rate being cut from 35 to 21 per cent. That puts the new rate broadly in line with the worldwide average, which as measured by the Tax Foundation across 202 jurisdictions currently stands at 22.96 per cent or 29.41 per cent when weighted by gross domestic product (GDP). Corporations will also stop having to pay corporate tax on any income earned from foreign operations, while such money that is brought back home will be taxed between 8 and 15.5 per cent, significantly lower than the 35-per cent tax they are currently paying.

Republicans believe such substantial cuts will spur a massive influx of business investment that will eventually lead to higher average wages for Americans. For example, Texas Congressman Mike Conaway stated, It's in all of our best interest to have these tax cuts for corporations so that they will have more money to invest in their business and pay their workers. But much of the research conducted thus far suggests otherwise; the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, for instance, recently concluded that workers would receive a maximum of only a quarter of the benefits from tax cuts; and even then, it is most likely to be the higher earners that would be the biggest beneficiaries.

Another piece of evidence to which analysts are pointing is data from S&P Dow Jones Indices, which shows that non-financial companies in the S&P 500 are already flush with cash at the moment, having between them an estimated $1.63 trillion. And despite this vast sum of cash, an investment boom has not transpired. Indeed, some top companies have made it explicitly clear that any tax relief they receive from the reforms will be primarily used to increase dividends and buy back stock to boost share prices. Amgen CEO Robert Bradway, for example, said We've been actively returning capital in the form of growing dividend and buyback, and expect us to continue that. And in terms of what businesses planned to do with any profit returned from abroad, a Bank of America Merrill Lynch survey of more than 300 CEOs found that paying down debt and stock buybacks were by far and away from the biggest priorities for businesses.

The other major pillar of the reform is the cuts that have been enacted for individual income earners, with middle-class taxpayers earning between $19,050 and $77,400 per year receiving a cut in tax from 15 to 12 per cent. Higher-bracket earners, meanwhile, will see their tax rates go from 25 to 22 percent (for incomes between $77,400 and $165,000); 33 to 24 percent ($165,000 to $315,000); and 39.6 to 35 percent ($400,000 to $600,000). And as far as analysis from the Tax Center is concerned, after-tax income will increase by an average of 2.2 per cent across all groups. However, all of this changes after a few years, due to official budget rules that limit the cost of the bill to $1.5 trillion in total which therefore means that to make the corporate tax cuts permanent, the individual tax relief will expire by 2025. As such, a tax increase will likely result by 2027, which, according to projections by the Tax Policy Center, will impact 53 per cent of Americans.

Whether the overall impact will be a net positive or negative for the US economy remains to be seen at this stage, therefore. While most analysis produced to date agrees that economic growth will receive a boost in the short-term, the predictions that have so far come in have been decidedly more mixed and less sure for longer time horizons. The non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation of the US Congress expects the gross domestic product to be 0.8 per cent higher on average each year during the next 10 years than baseline forecasts, thanks mainly to an expected increase in labour supply and business investment. According to the independent non-profit research organisation the Tax Foundation, meanwhile, the plan will primarily reduce marginal tax rates and the cost of capital. In turn, this will lead to a 1.7-per cent rise in GDP over the long-term, a 1.5-per cent increase in wages and a further 339,000 full-time equivalent jobs. This year, moreover, will see GDP growth being posted at 2.45 per cent, compared to baseline growth of 2.01 per cent.