MUSC 1101 Lecture 19: musical creations analysis
Document Summary
I have never realized the impact of repetition on music before. I now listen to songs with the ambition of searching for repetition to prove the statement false. When i musicalized my own words i was surprised to find that it actually worked, especially since my voice is nothing (cid:272)o(cid:373)pa(cid:396)ed to dia(cid:374)a"s voice, which sounds already musicalized. It (cid:449)as (cid:395)uite fas(cid:272)i(cid:374)ati(cid:374)g. i (cid:272)a(cid:374)"t liste(cid:374) to dia(cid:374)a"s o(cid:396)igi(cid:374)al se(cid:374)te(cid:374)(cid:272)e (cid:449)ithout a(cid:374)ti(cid:272)ipati(cid:374)g (cid:862)behave so strangely(cid:863) along with all of its pitch movements. This happened to my musical creations as well. In (cid:373)y fi(cid:396)st looped spee(cid:272)h of (cid:862)i(cid:374) the (cid:272)ultu(cid:396)e,(cid:863) i lea(cid:396)(cid:374)ed that it (cid:449)as lo(cid:374)g e(cid:374)ough to ha(cid:448)e the effects of the musicalizing, and not too long as to eliminate the effect. In the end of the speech where i heard the original statement again, i heard differences in tone, which i did not before. It brought about a certain familiarity as well.
