ECON 001B Lecture Notes - Lecture 13: Loanable Funds, Real Interest Rate, Time Preference

10 views3 pages

pucemallard867

12 May 2020

School

Pasadena City College

Department

Economy

Course

ECON 001B

Professor

Kim

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

Consider one market loanable funds market. Interaction of borrowers and lenders determine the market interest rate and the quantity of loanable funds exchange. Demand for loanable funds is determined by firms borrowing money to engage in new investment. As interest rate goes down more projects are profitable; demand for funds . Higher the interest rate you save more. Interest rates change as supply and demand moves factors shift the supply of loanable funds. As countries become richer they tend to save more. Those with strongest time preferences are less patience - saves less. Weaker time preference has more patience - save more. Consumption smoothing - generally prefer smooth path of consumption over time. Depending on population older tends to save less. Younger supply savings will shift out. Quantity of loanable funds decreases since equilibrium of real interest rate increases. Crowded out government run a deficit, the crowd out investment (bad)

Related Questions

QUESTION 11

If the demand for investment loans rises, this could be the result of

		the discovery of new and better roundabout methods of production.
		a lower rate of time preference in society.
		a lower interest rate.
		a higher interest rate.
		a and c

1 points

QUESTION 12

Which of the following statements is true?

		All persons have a high rate of time preference.
		People with a high rate of time preference are more likely to be borrowers than people with a low rate of time preference.
		People with a high rate of time preference are more likely to be lenders than people with a low rate of time preference.
		A high interest rate is the cause of a high rate of time preference.
		none of the above

1 points

QUESTION 13

Which of the following statements is true?

		The nominal interest rate is always higher than the real interest rate since the nominal interest rate equals the real interest rate plus the expected inflation rate.
		The nominal interest rate is always lower than the real interest rate since the nominal interest rate equals the real interest rate minus the expected inflation rate.
		The nominal interest rate can equal the real interest rate, but to do so the expected inflation rate must be zero percent.
		It is the nominal interest rate-not the real interest rate-that matters to borrowers.

1 points

QUESTION 14

If there is an increase in the expected inflation rate, then,

		the supply and demand for loanable funds will decrease.
		the supply and demand for loanable funds will increase.
		the supply of loanable funds will decrease, and the demand for loanable funds will increase.
		the supply of loanable funds will increase, and the demand for loanable funds will decrease.

1 points

QUESTION 15

If suddenly a 4 percent inflation rate (instead of a zero percent inflation rate) is expected by both suppliers and demanders in the loanable funds market, then

		the demand for loanable funds curve will shift rightward, and the supply of loanable funds curve will shift leftward.
		the demand for loanable funds curve will shift leftward, and the supply of loanable funds curve will shift rightward.
		both the demand for loanable funds curve and the supply of loanable funds curve will shift leftward.
		both the demand for loanable funds curve and the supply of loanable funds curve will shift rightward.

1. Why Niall Ferguson thought that the expansionary fiscal policy (or government deficit) could produce crowding-out effect? You can explain by using the IS-LM model or you can use the logic of loanable funds theory.

Niall Ferguson believed that expansionary fiscal policy could produce a crowding-out effect. Ferguson believed that if the government tried to increase demand during the crisis it would cause the real interest rate to increase. He theorized that if the government tried to boost the economy through deficit spending it would cause the interest rate to rise, which in turn would crowd-out investors and consumers. The interest in the deficit would lead to an increase in the demand for loanable funds, which would lead to an increase in interest rates. Ferguson stated "The lesson of economic growth is very clear. Economic growth does not come from state-led infrastructure investment. It comes from technological innovation, and gains in productivity, and these things come from private sector, not from the state."

2. Why Paul Krugman thinks that Niall Ferguson was wrong and thought that government deficit could not produce a crowding-out effect? In other words, please explain Krugman's Liquidity trap .

Paul Krugman disagreed with Ferguson and believed that the government deficit could not produce a crowding out effect. Krugman's liquidity trap: Private demand is so low that even if the short-term interest rate is 0% spending is less that what is needed for full employment. Normal monetary policy of the central bank purchasing short-term debts with new money is ineffective. Krugman argues that a major issue during the crisis was people wanting to save money combined with the private sector being far less likely to invest. He referred to this a "savings glut". It was argued that the federal reserve was playing the part that the private banking system through buying private securities and the federal government was playing the roll that business wasn't by engaging in investment. Due to the liquidity trap excess demand for savings is not going to drive interest rates up. Krugman stated " Government borrowing gives some of those excess saving a place to go and in the process expands overall demand, and hence GDP. It does not crowd out private spending, at least not until the excess supply of savings has been sopped up, which is the same thing as saying not until the economy has escaped from the liquidity trap."

3. In the discussion, other discussants such as George Soros and Robin Wells pointed out some interesting issues. Please provide at least one thing that you agree and one thing that you disagree. Discuss in details why you think so.

I agree with Soros view that the publics view of the financial markets has been forever changed. " Financial markets namely that they tend toward equilibrium, and that equilibrium is disturbed by extraneous forces, outside shocks. But the finical system collapsed of its own weight." I feel like this is a situation in which it takes a very long time to build trust, but that trust can be lost instantly. The crash has challenged the felling of security that people once felt in the banking system. The idea of the market regulating itself is fading, it wasn't until the government stepped that people felt reassured in the banking system. I believe this will lead to a period of government regulation that wouldn't have arose without this change in view. I disagree with robin Wells' view that the US needs to shift towards protectionism. I believe that free trade is good for everyone as long as there is a comparative advantage. If the US moves toward protections as a result of the deficit it will slow economic growth and place us at a disadvantage compared to countries with free trade. Not to mention consumers in the US will be placed with the burden of higher prices on goods.

Please make comments to the discussion I provided above(at least 300 words). And you can start with "I agree with you on some points... But I disagree with you on some points".

ECON 001B Lecture Notes - Lecture 13: Loanable Funds, Real Interest Rate, Time Preference

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

ECON 001B Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Gdp Deflator, Moe Williams, Money Supply

ECON 001B Lecture Notes - Lecture 7: Moe Williams, Profit Margin

ECON 001B Lecture Notes - Lecture 15: Moe Williams, Market Failure, Industrial Revolution

Related Questions