ADMJ 1100 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Alphonse Bertillon, Arnould Locard, Trace Evidence

70 views8 pages
CSI
Chapter 1 Lecture Slides
Physical Evidence
Forensic Science: application of science to the law (notably within the context of the criminal
justice system
Criminalistics: branch of forensics, specialists trained in recording, identifying, and interpreting
physical evidence
Criminal Investigation: process of discovering, collecting, preparing, identifying, and presenting
evidence to determine what happened and who is responsible
- Reconstructive process that uses deductive reasoning (logical process in which a
conclusion follows from specific facts = reasoning backwards)
Alphonse Bertillon
- Founder of criminal identification
- Identification should be based on unchanging physical characteristics
- Anthropometry: method of identification (human body was measured in 11 places)
o Height, trunk, reach, left foot
Portrait Parle (speaking card): used for suspect identification with descriptions of the human
head and features
- Outgoth of Betillios sste
Edmond Locard
- Prior to the 19th century, witness testimony was favored over physical evidence
- Locad’s Echage Piciple: he thee is otat etee to ites, thee ill e
a ehage
o Criminal leaves trace evidence and takes away something from the crime scene
Types of Evidence
- Direct Evidence: evidence that proves a fact without the necessity of inference or a
presumption, and, when true, conclusively establishes that fact
o i.e. video, audio, and DNA
- Circumstantial Evidence: involves a series of facts that tends, through inference, to
prove a fact at issue
o Tends to incriminate a person (does not directly prove that the suspect
committed the crime)
o Set of circumstances from which an assumption can be made
i.e. indirect evidence, suspect interviews, and testimonial evidence
- Testimonial Evidence: oral or written evidence given by a lay person or expert witness
o A lay witness is a witness to the crime who is interviewed by police and picks the
suspect out of a line-up
o An expert witness is someone who testifies on matters within their field of
expertise
i.e. a doctor testifying about analysis of an x-ray
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
o Can be direct or circumstantial evidence
- Physical Evidence: physical objects that are linked to the commission o a crime
o Must be recognized as potential evidence, collected in an appropriate manner,
and preserved properly
o Can be direct or circumstantial evidence
o Class Characteristics of Physical Evidence: physical qualities shared by a group of
like ites
Class-only types of evidence are those which cannot be linked to a single
source
May be shown to be like or consistent with a questioned source,
although not uniquely identifiable with that source
Criminal cases based solely on class evidence are more difficult to
prove and require more work
This evidence may be used to conclusively eliminate a suspected
source
i.e. threads used in a common jacket, chemical structure of a
batch of heroin, manufacturer of a firearm, ABO typing of a blood
sample
o Individual Characteristics of Physical Evidence: physical qualities that are unique
to an individual evidence item
Individualization: a pattern of class and individual characteristics
establishes the individuality of a specific object
Process usually involves the comparison of the questioned item to a
known item
i.e. a fingerprint, the striation marks on a fired bullet, the wear marks of a
used pair of shoes, the DNA code for a blood sample
Comparison Standards and Controls
- Questioned Item: an item with an unknown source that is to be compared with a known
source (usually collected from the crime scene, the victim, or the suspect)
- Known Source: evidence that originates from a known, acknowledged, or accounted for
source to be compared to the questioned evidence (gun recovered from suspect)
- Exemplar: type of known evidence collected from a known individual to be used for
comparison
The Comparison Process
When, Questioned item = Q and Known item = K
1. The class characteristics of Q do not agree with those of K
a. K is eliminated as the source of Q
2. The class characteristics of Q agree with those of K
a. If Q has only class characteristics, K may be the source of Q
3. The class characteristics of K and Q agree, but there is no agreement of individual
characteristics
a. K may not be the source of Q (inconsistent)
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
4. The class characteristics of K and Q agree, and there is some agreement in individual
characteristics between Q and K
a. K may be the source of Q (consistent)
5. There is sufficient agreement in class and individual characteristics between Q and K to
establish that K is the source of Q
a. K is identified as the source of Q (individualization)
Evidence Collection Requirements
- Ethical: the crime scene investigator must be objective with regard to recognition,
documentation, and collection of physical evidence at any scene
- Scientific: prevent the contamination of the evidence, preserve the condition of the
evidence, collect adequate comparison standards, package in appropriate containers,
and store in appropriate conditions
- Legal Requirements:
o 4th Amendment Protections: the right of the people to be secure in their
persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures
(warrants with probable cause)
o If a crime occurs on private property, consent to search from another occupant
or a search warrant must be obtained
o Weeks v. US: evidence that is illegally seized by the police cannot be used in trial
(exclusionary rule)
o The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine: evidence derived from an illegal
search or seizure cannot be used in trial
o Police do not need a warrant if there is consenting to search, exigent
iustaes, ojets ae i plai ie o i ope fields, ad ieitale
discovery
Searches by consent are allowed as long as the person or property being
searched is freely and voluntarily waiving his or her 4th Amendment rights
Consent can be implied if the owner or person in possession of an
item or place reports that a crime has been committed and
summons help
A search incident to lawful arrest does not require a warrant (if a person
is under arrest, the police may search their person and any area
surrounding the person that is within reach
Exigent circumstances: immediate and overriding need to search
i.e. endanger the lives of others, suspect may be destroying
evidence, to stop a crime in progress or in hot pursuit, to perform
a protective sweep of the property
Determined by degree of urgency, time to obtain a warrant, if
evidence is about to be removed or destroyed, danger at the site
Plain View Doctrine: ready visibility of objects that might be seized as
evidence during a search by police in the absence of a search warrant
specifying the seizure of those objects
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 8 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Forensic science: application of science to the law (notably within the context of the criminal justice system. Criminalistics: branch of forensics, specialists trained in recording, identifying, and interpreting physical evidence. Criminal investigation: process of discovering, collecting, preparing, identifying, and presenting evidence to determine what happened and who is responsible. Reconstructive process that uses deductive reasoning (logical process in which a conclusion follows from specific facts = reasoning backwards) Anthropometry: method of identification (human body was measured in 11 places) Identification should be based on unchanging physical characteristics: height, trunk, reach, left foot. Portrait parle (speaking card): used for suspect identification with descriptions of the human head and features. Prior to the 19th century, witness testimony was favored over physical evidence. Loca(cid:396)d"s e(cid:454)cha(cid:374)ge p(cid:396)i(cid:374)ciple: (cid:862)(cid:449)he(cid:374) the(cid:396)e is (cid:272)o(cid:374)ta(cid:272)t (cid:271)et(cid:449)ee(cid:374) t(cid:449)o ite(cid:373)s, the(cid:396)e (cid:449)ill (cid:271)e a(cid:374) e(cid:454)(cid:272)ha(cid:374)ge(cid:863: criminal leaves trace evidence and takes away something from the crime scene.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents