01:202:205 Lecture Notes - Lecture 20: Judicial Restraint, Social Cost, Police Misconduct
20 Aug 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
Exclusionary rule: from weeks v. us (1914) to mapp v. ohio (1961) Wolf v. colorado (1949: 14th amend applied to states (due process, exclusionary rule did not (was up to states to enforce, essentially argued for states rights. Mapp v. ohio: dissent argued to follow wolf position and allow states to enforce as states saw most appropriate as a result of the exclusionary rule they are. Is it a violation of law to not follow constitutional rules: people v. defore (1926) case for the exam) To send a strong message to police : (cid:498)the blood is on your hands! (cid:499) -court to law enforcement introduction of (cid:498)good(cid:499) evidence obtained by (cid:498)bad(cid:499) law (cid:498)the culprit goes free because the constable blundered. (cid:499) -judge. )dea was to put pressure on police is it working? (cid:498)bad methods(cid:499) refers to police actions that violate constitutional is (cid:498)indirectly(cid:499) based on constitutionally forbidden behavior rights.
