33:620:301 Lecture Notes - Lecture 12: Appellate Court, Title Search, Convenience Store
12 Dec 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor
Document Summary
The trial court issued judgment in favor of solaiman and chowdhury. Solaiman and chowdhury file action for breach of contract. Appellate court affirms judgement of trial court. Issue: was the description of the property sufficient enough to make th econtract enforceable. Mohammad salim bought a convenience store and gas station . He made some improvements to the property and then offered it for sale. Talat solaiman and sabina chowdhury approached salim about buying the property in. After negotiating a purchase price of ,000, the parties signed a handwritten document memorializing the terms of the agreement and on december 26, signed a more formal, typewritten purchase and sale agreement prepared by solaiman and. The agreement set a closing date of january 5, 2007 and required solaiman and. Chowdhury to pay a ,000 security deposit to be applied toward the down payment.
