01:920:108 Lecture Notes - Lecture 24: Ethnic Enclave, Asian Americans, Acculturation

43 views2 pages
1.
Importance of subsistence technology--> postindustrial: unlikely to offer many opportunities for people with lower education and skills.
2.
Agrarianpaternalistic relations (African Americans, American Indians and Mexican Americans)--> land and labor
3.
Industrialrigid competitive relationswhite ethnics, Asian Americans--> capital
4.
Post-industrialfluid competitive relationsrecent immigrationknowledge, tech, information
1.
Subsistence Techdominant-minority relations shaped by political, economic, social forces
1.
Chinese and Japanese Americans survived in ethnic enclaves (provided integration for various racial/ethnic minorities)
2.
Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans supplied low-paid manual labor for both the rural and urban economy
3.
2.
Social mobility-- like w/European Americans did not work for other minority groups (Mexican Americans, African Americans, etc)--> confronted urban poverty
and bankrupt cities in addition to the continuing barriers of racial prejudice and institutional discrimination
1.
Colonized minority group are at a greater power disadvantage than immigrant groups
2.
African Americans and American Indians (greater disadvantage than other groups in modern times)--> they are considered a colonized minority
group
3.
Both women and LGBTpatterns of inequality, marginalization, and denigration are easily documented
4.
Womensystem of oppression has been maintained and reinforced by highly visible physical markers of group membership
5.
LGBTdynamics of social visibility are more subtle and variable.
1.
Blauner’s hypothesiscolonized minority groups and immigrant minority groups
2.
Contemporary immigrant groups at opposite end of continuum (ex: Asian Indians)are more likely to approx. experiences of white ethnics and find
themselves in some version of middle-class suburbia
1.
Ethnocentrism, competition (increases prejudicediscrimination of minority group), differential in powerpower of dominant group helps sustain
inferior position of minority) Ex: Chinese Exclusion Act of 18821st significant restriction on immigration to U.SDifferential in power
determines outcome of initial contact situation and which group becomes dominant and which becomes minority
2.
Both women and LGBTboth have to organize, acquire resources, and confront bastions of privilege in streets and courtrooms to improve their
situations and move closer to equality. Womenthe system made a formal commitment to equality many decades ago.
3.
Noel hypothesisif three conditions-ethnocentrism, differential in power, and competition are present in contact situation, then ethnic or racial
stratification will occur
4.
Jobs will continue to be the primary objects of competition
3.
Contact situationconditions under which the minority group and dominant group first come into contact with each other
1.
Different group members can put a person at a disadvantage and influence their life changes
2.
Women of the dominant group and minority women have had much less access to leadership roles and higher-status positions and have generally occupied
a subordinate status, even in their own groups.
3.
LGBT peopleexperiences of members of these groups vary by race, class, and gender
4.
Women of every minority group have tended to take the least-desirable, lowest-status positions available in the economy
4.
Intersectionality
1.
Highly acculturated (share language, values, and beliefs of white Americans of similar class and educational background)
2.
IntegrationAfrican Americans present mixed picture (ex: larger percentage of African Americans remain mired in urban poverty)
3.
Overall, the group as a whole are still highly segregated in their residential and school attendance patterns, and unemployment and poverty remain
serious problems
1.
African Americans
1.
Less acculturated than African Americans, and some tribes and organizations are trying to preserve American Indian cultures and languages
2.
Integrationthere is some indication of improvement, but many American Indians are among the most isolated and impoverished minority-group
members in the U.S.
2.
American Indians
1.
Members of the largest Hispanic American groups are generally less acculturated than African Americans.
2.
Hispanic traditions and Spanish language have been sustained by the exclusion and isolation of these groups within the U.S.
3.
Cubans have moved closer to equality than Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans, but they resisted assimilation and built ethnic enclave economy
(immigrant minority group)--> Cubans
4.
Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans share many of the problems of urban poverty that confront African Americans and they are below nat’l norms
on measures of equality and integration (both colonized minority groups)
5.
Mexican Americansmoved to rural areas
6.
Cuban and Puerto Ricansmoved to urban areas
7.
Smaller Hispanic groupsnew immigrants beginning assimilation processMany members of this group, and Mexican Americans and Puerto
Ricans, are less educated and have few occupational skills, and face dangers of blending into a permanent underclass.
3.
Hispanic Americans
1.
Extent of assimilation among this group and Hispanic Americans is highly variable
2.
Some Asian American groups (more elite immigrants from India or the Philippines) seem to be finding a place in American mainstream
3.
Other groups consist largely of newer immigrants w/ occupational and educational profiles that often resemble those of colonized minority groups
face danger of permanent marginalization and exclusion
4.
Other Asian American groups (ex: Korean Americans) have constructed ethnic enclaves and pursue economic equality by resisting acculturation
4.
Asian Americans
5.
European American ethnic groupsApproximate traditional model of assimilation, and Culturally and racially, these groups are closest to dominant group
6.
Women“Acculturation” has not been accomplishedwomen are equal to men on some measures of equality (ex: education) but large gaps in other
areas (ex: income) persist
7.
LGBTIncreasingly included in pop culture of dominant society and Patterns of inequality generally follow those in larger society, and like women, seem
not to receive rewards proportionate to their degree of preparation for the job market.
5.
Assimilation and PluralismGordon’s traditional view of assimilationbelieves that assimilation is a linear, inevitable processacculturation to secondary
structural assimilation to primary structural assimilation, to intermarriagebut traditional view is not always the case (like ethnic enclavesCubans did not
assimilate to dominant culture)
6.
Assimilationgroup membership is important b/c it is linked to patterns of inclusion, exclusion, and inequality
Lecture: Day 24
Monday, April 23, 2018
12:27 AM
Minority Groups in American Society Page 1
Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 2 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents