BLAW 101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Belle Gibson, Free Range, Santa Barbara City College
Document Summary
Case: accc v thermomix (cacl 13. 410) s29(1)(a) Keep on selling product even after learned of safety issue. This creates false impression it is safe. Case: accc v turi (cacl 13. 420) s29(1)(a) Case: optus v. telstra (cacl 13. 430) s29(1)(b) Case: accc v. heinz (cacl 13. 440) s29(1)(g) Shows happy active toddler, 99% fruit and veg (implies it is healthy) Can"t misinform customers about the availability of remedies under the acl. Case: accc v apple(cacl 13. 460) s29(1)(m) Acceptable quality is protected by acl (s54) Apple has error that breaks some iphones and ipads. Apple tells customers no remedy if a third-party repaired their device. Says customers have no remedy if warranty has expired. Not when the good is made in another country. Whether the goods were substantially transformed" in the claimed country of origin. Goods will be substantially transformed" if, as a result of one or more processes undertaken in that country, the goods are.
