LGLS 1101 Lecture Notes - Lecture 1: Precedent

25 views2 pages

Document Summary

Elonis was charged with five counts of transmitting in interstate commerce. Elonis argued that he is protected under the first amendment of the constitution. The prosecution says that true threats are the historic exception to the freedom of speech protected by the first amendment. Elonis argued that under the first amendment of the constitution the government must prove he had a subjective intent to threaten. The government argued that it doesn"t need to prove the specific intent of elonis but the intent of a reasonable person. Elonis wants the prosecution to argue is specific intent and to prove that he specifically knew and directly intended for his post to strike legitimate fear into his victims. The prosecution wants to prove that any reasonable person would know that those post would strike fear into people, in other words any sane and rational person would know those post would cause fear from a person.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents

Related Questions