🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →

HomeClass Notes1,200,000US530,000

MTH 130 Lecture Notes - Lecture 15: Approximation Error, Linearization, Trigonometric Functions

37 views4 pages

21 Nov 2017

School

University of Miami

Department

Course

Professor

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

2. 8 linear approximations and di erentials notes: sterling. Provide a generalization to each of the key terms listed in this section. L (x) f (a) (x a) + f (a) Let"s say that you have a function, which is normally f (x), that"s di erentiable at the a point, which can be labeled with a. When it comes to any estimation methods, then there is an error is actually being committed; the absolute error of a linear approximation is the exact estimation minus the approximated estimation, which can be explained the following: Approximation = f (a) (x a) + f (a) Ae = e (x) = exact approximation. Ae = e (x) = f (x) [f (a) (x a) + f (a)] If the estimation error, which is e(x), is greater than 0, which can be expressed with e(x) > 0, then that means that the approximation would be an underestimation.

Related Documents

MTH 130 Lecture Notes - Lecture 10: Quotient Rule, Power Rule, Product Rule

MTH 130 Study Guide - Quiz Guide: Ds 4, Semicircle, Hypotenuse

MTH 130 Lecture Notes - Lecture 21: Railways Act 1921

Related Questions

answers the Qs? 5 stars for corect and complete answers

This exercise is intended to give you some insight into why the second derivative test works. A good pan of what I'm asking you to do has been adapted form the Discovery Project on page 821 of our text. In 11.4, we wrote down the tangent plane or linear approximation of a function f(x, y) at a point. To simplify this exercise, we're going to assume that the point is located at the origin, x=0, y=0. Then At a critical point, the two partial derivatives are 0, so the linear approximation just simplifies f(x, y) f(0,0), which is the equation of a horizontal plane. This just doesn't give enough information to determine whether we have a max, min, or saddle. So we look at the quadratic approximation at (0,0), which is defined as follows: At a critical point, this will reduce to It can be proved that if the function f(x, y) has continuous second partials, then it will have the same type of critical point as its quadratic approximation. Let f(x, y) = e-x2-2y2 Find the first partial derivatives Find the first partial derivatives fx(x, y) and fy(x, y): Evaluate fx(0,0) and fy(0, 0). Find the second partial derivatives fxx(x, y), fxy(x, y) and fyy(x, y): Evaluate fxx, fxy and fyy at the critical point. In order to recognize the shape of this graph from its equation, it will be helpful to rewrite the equation in a different form so that: Complete the square for the quadratic approximation and state the values of a, b, c, and d. What docs the graph of the quadratic approximation look like? A: paraboloid opening up. B: paraboloid opening down, C: saddle. Judging from your knowledge of the shape of the graph in exercise 16, does the quadratic approximation have a max, min or saddle? Enter MAX, MIN, or SADDLE. Recall that in the second derivative test, at a critical point (a. b). For f(x, y), state the values of D and fxx. Does the second derivative test tell you that the critical point of f is a local maximum, local minimum, or saddle? After you've completed the lab, we'll take time out to see how the quadratic approximation relates to the second derivative test.

Q1)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q2)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q3)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q4)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q5)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q6)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q7)

If U and V are positive constants, find all critical points of the function. (Enter your answers as a comma-separated list.) F(t) = Ue t + Ve -t t = Find all critical points of f(x) = 20 x 2 e - 0.3x and classify them as local minima of ,maxima. x = (smaller value) This critical point is a . x = (larger value) This critical point is a . Consider f(x) = x 8 (7 - x) 9. Find f '(x) and simplify your answer. f '(x) = Find all critical points of f(x) and then use the first derivation test to determine local maxima and minima. f(x) has a at x = (smallest value) Local Maximum OR Minimum OR Neither f(x) has a at x = Local Maximum OR Minimum OR Neither f(x) has a at x = (largest value) Local Maximum OR Minimum OR Neither Find the inflection points of f(t) = t 4 + t 3 - 18t 2 +8. Give exact answer. t = (smallest value) t = (largest value) Sketch a possible of y = f(x), using the given information about derivation y' = f'(x) and y" = f"(x). Assume that the function is defined and continuous for all real x. Let f be a function f(x) > 0 for all x. Let g = 1/f. If f is increasing in an interval around x 0, what about g? g is increasing in an interval x 0. g is zero in an interval around x 0. g is decreasing in an interval around x 0. We cannot tell whether g is increasing or decreasing in an interval around x 0. g is constant in an interval around x 0. If f has a local maximum at x 1, what about g? g has a local maximum at x 1. g has both a local minimum and a local maximum at x 1. We cannot tell whether g has a local minimum or a local maximum at x 1. g has an inflection point at x 1. g has a local minimum at x 1. If f is a concave down at x 2, what about g? g is increasing at x 2. g is flat at x 2. We cannot tell whether g is concave up of concave down at x 2. g is concave down at x 2. g is concave up at x 2. You are given the graph of the second derivation function f" below. Which of the given have x-values that are inflection points of the function f? (Select all the apply.) A B C D E F G H I none of the above