LSJ 200 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Equal Protection Clause, Gie, Police Misconduct
Document Summary
What (cid:449)e"(cid:448)e (cid:271)ee(cid:374) t(cid:396)(cid:455)i(cid:374)g to do is (cid:396)e(cid:272)ko(cid:374) (cid:449)ith the th(cid:396)ee (cid:373)ai(cid:374) the(cid:373)es of the (cid:272)ou(cid:396)se, a(cid:374)d to (cid:396)e(cid:272)ko(cid:374) (cid:449)ith them around the question of the violence that the police can sometimes exercise. We also talked about the fact that we have endowed the police with significant tools for violence so that they can enforce the law and the(cid:455) (cid:272)a(cid:374) keep the pea(cid:272)e i(cid:374) (cid:449)a(cid:455)s that (cid:449)e thi(cid:374)k a(cid:396)e legiti(cid:373)ate. But (cid:449)e a(cid:396)e al(cid:449)a(cid:455)s fa(cid:272)ed (cid:449)ith la(cid:449)"s violence with this nettlesome, inescapable, and quite contentious question about how can we differentiate between legitimate uses of violence and illegitimate uses of law of violence. We can recognize that law is violent, we can understand why it needs to be violent, but we can also (cid:272)o(cid:374)ti(cid:374)uall(cid:455) ask (cid:395)uestio(cid:374)s a(cid:271)out (cid:449)hethe(cid:396) la(cid:449)s" (cid:448)iole(cid:374)(cid:272)e (cid:272)a(cid:374) (cid:271)e legiti(cid:373)atel(cid:455) e(cid:454)e(cid:396)(cid:272)ised i(cid:374) o(cid:374)e"s situatio(cid:374) or another. That problem becomes particularly nettlesome when we think about the second theme of the class.