Class Notes (1,100,000)

US (480,000)

UCLA (10,000)

STATS (200)

STATS 10 (100)

Zanontian, L.A. (8)

Lecture 4

Department

StatisticsCourse Code

STATS 10Professor

Zanontian, L.A.Lecture

4This

**preview**shows half of the first page. to view the full**3 pages of the document.**Stephanie Sanchez

UID: 904 652 912

Stas 10 Lec 4

Section 4A

TA: Min, S.

Lab #4: TB or Not TB?

Question 1: Summarize the results of Hill’s study. a.) Based on Hill’s study, does it seem that

treatment and outcome are independent or dependent (i.e. does it seem like Streptomycin is

ineffective or effective in treating tuberculosis)? Justify your answer.

a. we can see that 51 out of 55 in the treatment group received the streptomycin recovered.

38 out of 52 people recovered, of the people in the control group who received only bed

rest. It is clear that the people in the treatment group are more likely to recover, from

summary table. It seems like the people are dependent and therefore streptomycin is an

effective treatment.

Question 2: a.) Without doing any simulations in Fathom, if treatment and outcome were

independent, what proportion of patients according to Hill’s study, would we expect to die if we

replicated the study again? b.) how many patients in the Streptomycin group would we expect to

die if treatment and outcome were independent?

a. The proportion of people who will die if the study was repeated again is about 0.168, if

treatment and outcome were independent. If both the treatment and outcome were

independent we would be able to expect about 18 people to die.

b. We would expect about 9 people to die in the streptomycin group. 0.168 x 55 (people in

streptomycin group) equals the total people who would die if treatment and outcome

were independent.

###### You're Reading a Preview

Unlock to view full version