PHIL 1104 Lecture 6: lecture 6-2

20 views2 pages
10 Dec 2016
School
Department
Course

Document Summary

Deceiving someone into sex undermines sexual consent. To(cid:373) doughe(cid:396)ty"s basi(cid:272) idea: we should have at least as high standards for consent in the sexual arena as we have in other realms of life, house-buying example (steel vs wood) In sexual arena, these standards are often compromised. Is his claim about deception about any deal breaker not consent going too far: objection 1: maybe some lies undermine sexual consent. But surely not all of them do. My breasts are real: these do not seem like the end of the world, easy to think dougherty goes too far when he says lying about all deal breakers undermines sexual consent, some deal breakers are petty. I"(cid:373) (cid:449)hite: petty and immoral deal breaker, doughe(cid:396)ty"s respo(cid:374)se. Consider how we must treat the deal-breaker is there is no deception. Petty deal breaker: no sex with anyone who is not an ivy league student.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents