PHIL 1104 Lecture Notes - Lecture 9: Joel Feinberg, People V. Turner, Retributive Justice
Document Summary
Co(cid:374)se(cid:374)t = (cid:449)ai(cid:448)i(cid:374)g o(cid:374)e"s (cid:396)ight (cid:894)g(cid:396)a(cid:374)ti(cid:374)g a pe(cid:396)(cid:373)issio(cid:374) (cid:449)he(cid:396)e the(cid:396)e othe(cid:396)(cid:449)ise (cid:449)as (cid:374)o(cid:374)e(cid:895) Fo(cid:396)feitu(cid:396)e = losi(cid:374)g o(cid:374)e"s (cid:396)ight as a fu(cid:374)(cid:272)tio(cid:374) of dese(cid:396)t: negligence (leaving bike in public property, state takes it, wrong-doing (self-defense if person acts to harm you) We have compared consent and forfeiture in a variety of literatures: euthanasia. Can retract up until you die: sexual consent. Exercising rights rather than losing them: abortion. Why did joel feinberg think that it does not hinge on reasonable precaution but on consent. Compare: anne (pregnant due to contraceptive failure) Having sex counts as consent to letting a fetus in their body. Has sex with . 1% chance of pregnancy: bertha (pregnant due to faulty contraceptives) Has not consented to chances she took. Consented to . 1% chance of pregnancy, sex she had involved a 20% chance of pregnancy. Can do more harm to them then they are doing to you. Innocent if drugged, insane, child, have to use lenient thesis.
