BIOE 20C Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: Trophic Cascade, Commensalism, Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis

32 views5 pages
Lecture 16 11/24/2015 8:59:00 PM
Commensalism
+/0
One species gains in fitness
Other species is unaffected
Remoras and large fish/whales
Remora gets protection, food scraps, free ride
Host not affected
Fat Innkeeper Worm and Guests
Worm creates safe, well ventilated burrow for
o Goby (fish)
o Pea crab
o Scale worm
“borders have no fitness impact on worm
Indirect Interactions
Two spp that do not directly interact exert influence on each other
Influence is indirect
Consequence of interaction with another species
Ex. Trophic cascade
Trophic Cascade in Yellowstone
Wolves removed in 1925, restored in 1995
Elk culled until 1968afterwards population grows rapidly
Aspen grazing by elk increases in absence of wolves, no new
recruits until the wolves return
It gets even more complicated as other species are affected by the
absence of wolves
Keystone Species
Spp with effects on communities that are disproportionate to their
biomass
ie. Small part of the ecosystem but play a major role in structuring
the community
Tend to be top level predators
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Species Diversity
Key feature of communities
Can be measured in two ways
o Species richness=total number of spp
o Species diversity=weighted measure that includes both spp #
and abundances
Cause/Role of Species Diversity
Why are some communities more diverse than others?
What effect does spp diversity have on community
structure/function?
Global Patterns of Spp Diversity
Many terrestrial ecosystems show pattern of decreasing diversity
with latitude
No such distinct global patterns in marine ecosystems
Factors that Influence Community Diversity
Productivity
Disturbance
Habitat size
Productivity Hypothesis
High productivity supports more spp
Supported by natural patterns
Contradicted by experimental studies
Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis
Frequent disturbance=few species
o r selected species dominate
Rare disturbance=few species
o K selected species dominate
Intermediate disturbance=higher spp #
o Mix of r and K selected species
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 5 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Commensalism: +/0, one species gains in fitness, other species is unaffected. Remoras and large fish/whales: remora gets protection, food scraps, free ride, host not affected. Fat innkeeper worm and guests: worm creates safe, well ventilated burrow for, goby (fish, pea crab, scale worm, borders have no fitness impact on worm. Indirect interactions: two spp that do not directly interact exert influence on each other, influence is indirect, consequence of interaction with another species, ex. Keystone species: spp with effects on communities that are disproportionate to their biomass ie. small part of the ecosystem but play a major role in structuring the community, tend to be top level predators. Species diversity: key feature of communities, can be measured in two ways, species richness=total number of spp, species diversity=weighted measure that includes both spp # and abundances. Global patterns of spp diversity: many terrestrial ecosystems show pattern of decreasing diversity with latitude, no such distinct global patterns in marine ecosystems.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers