ETHN 3 Lecture : Assign 3 Rubric 2018s
1 Jun 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor
Rubric for Writing Assignment 3, MMW 13, Spring 2018
In order to do well on this assignment, do the following:
1. Write a complete rough draft, citing your sources correctly and fully in MLA format and
providing a list of Works Cited.
2. Write a Dear Reader Letter to your peers, following the assignment sheet
3. Give a copy of your rough draft and Dear Reader letter to your TA and to each member
of your peer workshop group (to be assigned by your TA) on the due date in Week 8.
Your draft must be 6 to 10 pages long (plus the list of works cited, which you must
include with your rough draft), and should be as complete and as polished as possible.
Failure to get copies of your rough draft and Dear Reader Letter to your TA and to
your group members by the due date in Week 8 will result in an F for this
assignment.
4. Bring your correctly labelled, highlighted PDF/DOCX files of all your sources to the
workshop.
5. Use scholarly sources and include at least one primary source and one peer-reviewed
journal article.
6. Write comments in the margins and a Dear Writer Letter for each peer’s draft you are
reviewing before the workshop. Write substantial, helpful comments.
7. Come on time for your workshop meeting and participate actively in the workshop,
giving verbal and written feedback. Failure to meet with your group will result in an
F for this assignment. If you neither submit rough drafts to your TA and group
members nor attend a workshop, you will fail the course. Do not let this happen!
A-/A: Meets all of the above criteria, contributing to the peer review process at an exceptionally
high level, to the benefit of self and peers
B/B+: Meets most of the above criteria at a very high level, with only minor exceptions, making
significant contributions
C+/B-: Meets most of the above criteria at a high level, but could contribute more fully
C-/C: Attempts to meet the above criteria, and makes limited, but still useful, contribution to
the peer review process
D: Submits a draft and letter to TA and group members by due date and meets with group,
but otherwise does not contribute in a useful way to the peer workshop
F: Fails to submit copies of complete rough draft and letter to TA and group members by
due dates; fails to meet with group
Document Summary
Rubric for writing assignment 3, mmw 13, spring 2018. Your draft must be 6 to 10 pages long (plus the list of works cited, which you must include with your rough draft), and should be as complete and as polished as possible. Write substantial, helpful comments: come on time for your workshop meeting and participate actively in the workshop, giving verbal and written feedback. Failure to meet with your group will result in an. If you neither submit rough drafts to your ta and group members nor attend a workshop, you will fail the course. do not let this happen! significant contributions high level, to the benefit of self and peers. A-/a : meets all of the above criteria, contributing to the peer review process at an exceptionally. B/b+: meets most of the above criteria at a very high level, with only minor exceptions, making.
