PHIL315 Lecture Notes - Lecture 23: Modal Realism, Possible World
5/4
Fie-tuig arguet
❖ Step 1- explanation needed; so weird, need explanation (really low probability needs
special explanation)
❖ Step 2- best explanation = God
❖ Really improbable things happen all the time
❖ Every possible value of constants happen in every combination; we are in a world that
constants occurred in a way for intelligent life
❖ Standard reply to step 2 = many worlds
❖ Every possible thing (arbitrary and contingent) that could happen happens in at least
one world, according to Lewis
Uncountable infinity of worlds
❖ Whe e sa thigs like “herlok hoes does ot eist are e speakig
unrestrictedly? (all the possible worlds; if he does not exist = false), or restrictedly?
(true: implicit restriction = the actual world… theres o atual “herlok Holes)
❖ Vaninwagen – clash b/w common sense and his view; happy to revise common sense
(he thinks common sense people believe in chairs; he thinks they are mistaken)
❖ Lewis – reluctant to revise common sense; respects common sense within limits
o Our senses = direct perception
o Modal realism
o Most realists about possible worlds = faint-hearted: quienian = one concrete
totality containing all that there is, all that exists, and all that is actual;
existence=actuality… ersets ie
▪ Possible worlds are more like fictional characters; abstract; exist, actual,
apart of this world, but abstract parts of this world;
▪ This concrete totality that we are a part of, is not a possible world
▪ Only one of the possible worlds is actualized
❖ Lewis thinks there are 3 basic choices for erthetism
o A non-fitio should e a true stor… hat is it for a stor to e true? –
description of events (set of propositions that are all true) must actually have
occurred in the history of the orld… a possible world is a complete story of a
world – linguistic erthetism… maximally consistent set of propositions = maximal
consistent way a world may be ... most common
o One way to represent world – pictorially, that are ore/less realisti… the ore
realistic they are, the more they correspond to reality
o Magial erthetis – in virtue of what, does something represent a world? The
structure of the story/picture corresponds in the right way to the structure of the
world. Representation relation is a matter of the match between the two
structures. Magial erthetis sas that its ot like the other to… the relatio is
PRIMITIVE
find more resources at oneclass.com
find more resources at oneclass.com
Document Summary
Step 1- explanation needed; so weird, need explanation (really low probability needs special explanation) Really improbable things happen all the time. Every possible value of constants happen in every combination; we are in a world that constants occurred in a way for intelligent life. Standard reply to step 2 = many worlds. Every possible thing (arbitrary and contingent) that could happen happens in at least one world, according to lewis. Vaninwagen clash b/w common sense and his view; happy to revise common sense (he thinks common sense people believe in chairs; he thinks they are mistaken) The structure of the story/picture corresponds in the right way to the structure of the world. Representation relation is a matter of the match between the two structures. Magi(cid:272)al erthetis(cid:373) sa(cid:455)s that its (cid:374)ot like the other t(cid:449)o the relatio(cid:374) is. 3 versions: linguistic languages are arbitrary; words do(cid:374)(cid:859)t ha(cid:448)e (cid:374)atural (cid:373)ea(cid:374)i(cid:374)g: pictorial succeed in representing by resemblance, (cid:862)(cid:373)agi(cid:272)al(cid:863)