Class Notes (835,867)
United States (324,281)
Philosophy (78)
PHIL 2010H (22)
Preston (22)
Lecture 25

PHIL 2010H Lecture 25: PhilosophyNotesApril12

2 Pages
67 Views
Unlock Document

Department
Philosophy
Course
PHIL 2010H
Professor
Preston
Semester
Spring

Description
04/12/2017 Argument from Design II (Philo’s version, 10) ● Chunks of matter do not naturally form themselves into objects useful for human beings, such as knives or watches ● Thus, the order and purposeful adjustment of means to end in an artifact is caused by the intelligent mind of its maker, not by the matter of which it is made. ● Experience thus shows us that order and purpose are characteristics of mind, not matter. ● From similar effects we can infer similar causes. ● Nature has superb order and purposeful adjustment of means to ends, just like an artifact. ● Conclusion: the cause of natural order and purposeful adjustment of means to ends must be a god with a superhumanly intelligent and purposeful mind. Two Objections to the Argument from Design ● The analogy is still weak. The argument from design requires us to take the example of human artifact making as a model for the origin of nature. But human beings are only one very tiny part of nature. Why should we think the way this tiny part of nature works at all is analogous to the way the whole of nature works? ● The analogy is not actually supported by experience. What we call an argument from experience is an argument based on the observation of numerous cases, so that we can reasonably infer to new cases. For example, if on many occasions we have observed fire in conjunction with smoke, we can then infer there is fire on subsequent occasions where we only observe the smoke. Similarly, we have regularly observed that where there is an artifact there is an intelligent human maker. So on occasions where we only observe the artifact, we can infer an intelligent maker. But there is only one nature. We haven’t observed numerous cases where a nature is regularly conjoined with an intelligent maker. So our experience does not allow us to infer that one nature of which we do not have experience has an intelligent maker. The Divine Mind is Incomprehensible to Us: Part I (Demea, 15) ● The content of the human mind comes either from the ​external senses ​(sight, hearing, etc.) or fro
More Less

Related notes for PHIL 2010H

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit