HISTORY 244 Lecture Notes - Lecture 16: System On A Chip, East Jerusalem, Palestinians

27 views7 pages
26 Jun 2018
School
Department
Outline -- The Oslo Process
I. The Big Picture
Chief pal emotion
Sense of injustice and humiliation
Arabs weren’t responsible for holocaust but they had to play the price
In 1967, israel came up against more effective opposition
As a result both sides began to realize that a swap of land for peace makes
sense
This realism began in the 1970s in egypt
In the 1990s, israel and its eastern folks also reached a stalemate
Israel became more willing to compromise in the east after likud’s two
failed attempts
The same deadlock in the southwest now began to transform israel’s
eastern frontiers
II. A Golden Moment in the East
What made peace with egypt possible was that egypt and israel were worn out
Compromise was the only way forward
Same became true in east in 1990s
5 factors came together to weaken plo - all related bc they all represent collapse
of soviet union and america only super power after cold war
1- the first intifada showed that colonizing the entire bank was impractical,
but didnt stop israels settlement close to green line
Israel wanted to keep for strategic reasons
Population grew by almost 50% after first intifada
PLO sensed time was not on their side. Everyday likud was
creating ___ on the floor
2) The massive immigration of jews from the soviet union
Once the soviet union collapsed, russian jews entered israel
By 2000 a million had fled into israel
Third had science or technological degrees
The smartest of the alliyahs
Dramatically increased economy
Provided more settlers for the territory
3) collapse of soviet union 1989
Pals could no longer count on support of sov union
Without sov weapons, they had no military option
4) gulf war of 1990-91
This problem was really of the PLOs own making
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Started when the iraqi leader invaded kuwait for oil
5) pulled in favor of compromise -> rise of hamas
Hamas was engineer of first intifada
Israel would only respond to violence
Negotiations were a waste of time
Plo said negotiations could help palestine
The only potential for peace agreement was PLO
Hamas gave israel and plo another reason to work together
Israel was chasten by lebanon and first intifada,
Lebanon was chasten by settlements, russian immigration, soviet collapse, first
gulf war
Israel and plo were both scared of Hamas
Labors electoral victory
Fought on the issue of peace
Preliminary talks had began at conference in madrid spain in ‘91
New prime minister showed us that israel cannot subdue palestine by
force, negotiation is the only solution
III. Negotiations to 1995: The New Optimism
Better in the early 90s then anytime in history
Rabin made progress
In almost 1993, PLO and Israel stunned the world when they announced that
they agreed on the Declaration of Principle
Televised ceremony along the white house
Signed 1993
Rabin and Yitzhak shook hands as clinton beamed on
Oslo Peace Process
Declaration set up a framework for negotiations for which the questions
could be addressed
Cairo
Plo accepted israel’s rights to exist while israel recognized the PLO as the
representatives of the Palestinian people
Palestinian Authority- take charge of gaza strip and Jericho
PA would take over after phased israeli withdrawals
PA would create their own security forces
Final decision would be faced in may of 1995
Violence would end and peaceful negotiation was only way forward
2:1 ratio
Created 3 territorial categories in west bank
Category A- main palestinian cities
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-2 of the document.
Unlock all 7 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Outline -- the oslo process: the big picture. Arabs weren"t responsible for holocaust but they had to play the price. In 1967, israel came up against more effective opposition. As a result both sides began to realize that a swap of land for peace makes sense. This realism began in the 1970s in egypt. In the 1990s, israel and its eastern folks also reached a stalemate. Israel became more willing to compromise in the east after likud"s two failed attempts. The same deadlock in the southwest now began to transform israel"s eastern frontiers. What made peace with egypt possible was that egypt and israel were worn out. Same became true in east in 1990s. 5 factors came together to weaken plo - all related bc they all represent collapse of soviet union and america only super power after cold war.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents