HISTORY 244 Lecture Notes - Lecture 17: Presbyterian Polity, Ariel Sharon, Western Wall

60 views10 pages
26 Jun 2018
School
Department
Outline -- The Missing Peace
I. Stepping Back from the Abyss
1999 both sides sood on sides of abyss and both sides stood back temporarily
PA was reluctant to crack down on Hamas bc arafat didn't want to alienate that
population
He began to realize that uncontrolled violence could push netanyahu to
make no concessions at all, and make it impossible for labor to replace
likud (netanyahu)
1986- began to crack down on hamas terrorism
PA was willing to work with israel
Could the PA find an israeli partner that was more agreeable to talk w than
netanyahu
The chances of finding a cooperative partner improved dramatically in 99
Leading israeli generals decided israel security needed rapid peace agreement
and netanyahu was making it impossible
ehud barak was most decorated in all of israel
Became part of labor party
Entered 99 election
Promised a breakthrough in the peace process
Promised to withdraw from south lebanon within a year
Won 56 to 44
Revived some optimism that began with oslo in 93
The events in those 6 years dud take a toll on the peace
Oslo was still alive by 99
Both sides stepped back from the abyss
II. South Lebanon
Barak dealt with south lebanon after 15 year war
Trying to protect territory in lebanon
hizballah - lebanese shiite group
Barak withdraw unilaterally
Suddenly withdrew all troops
In may 2000
hizballah couldn't attack israeli forces
Hailed this as part of bold leadership
South lebanon became israel's vietnam
If israelis were glad to be out of lebanon
Withdraw made jewish state look weak
hizballah - First arab movement ever to defeat israel
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Don't make concessions to israelis, fight persistently, eventually israelis
will grow weary and retreat
hizballah inspired second intifada
III. Negotiations to Mid-2000
Baraks main effort focused on the west bank and gaza
The struggle with the pals was the core issue
If he could solve relations with pal, syria and lebanon would have no reason for
hostility
Late 1999- arafat and barak started to start final status talks
promised to reach peace agreement within a year by late 2000
By march 2000, no progress had been made
Pa in israel had secret negotiations in sweden
Both sides still remained quite far apart
Because of these unpromising signs, clinton and barak now decided that
the best hope for a breakthrough lay in a summit meeting between arafat
and barak with clinton presiding
Clinton wanted peace in middle east to be his legacy
Determined to succeed
Baraks coalition in the kennesset was weakening
Secular program which alienated the religious party which he depended
on to stay in power
Political survival depended on successful negotiations
Arafat had no enthusiasm
Didn't have enough time to prepare
More preliminary problems
The 2 weeks which clinton allocated for negotiation were inadequate
Arafat feared he was being brought into a trap
Said a crisis in inevitable and he’d be blamed for the talks
In the end it was impossible for arafat to turn down an invitation from the
president of the us
On july 11, 2000 - arafat still distrustful and barak and clinton and their
many aides converged on camp david where they were to hold a two
week summit which hoped to settle the hundred year dispute
IV. Camp David: The Issues
3 chief issues discussed:
Borders
Israel first proposed giving up all of gaza and giving up 14% of west bank
including green line and 2 east west carters that would connect israel to
jordan valley bc strategically imp to protect against attacks from the west
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in
Wanted to hold on to 10% of jordan valley from palestine- lease it
Promised to keep 24% of west bank, pals want to give up nothing
Arafat complained this was not okay
Clinton agreed with Pal that israeli proposals were not fair
Also said PA requests of complete return of pre 67 borders was
also not ok
Said israel should keep 9% of west bank and give up 1% of land of
its own territory and israel would take a net 8% of the bank
Said there should be no east west corridors
Israel should keep outposts in jordan valley for 12 years, and after
everything would revert to palestinians
Israel said yes, PA rejected
Pa did offer 4% of WB, provided israel gave up some of their
own land, equivalent to the 4%
Gap was getting smaller
Jerusalem
Israel and pa positions on jerusalem
Israel wanted an undivided city originally
Muslims would have custody of muslim holy sights in old city
of jerusalem which are next to jewish holy sights
Temple mount- jews called it
Noble sanctuary- muslims called it
Jews would maintain ultimate military authority over entire
jerusalem while each had own religious
The PA wants 2 separate cities
East jerusalem would be capital of pal
West jerusalem would be capital of israel
Clinton proposes a swiss cheese compromise
Arab neighborhood under palestinian sovereignty , israeli under
israeli sovereignty
Muslim and jews would each control their own holy sites
Sovereignty of the holy sights would remain with israel
Each state would establish its own capital in israel
Barak accepted this compromise
All previous leaders said that jerusalem must maintain as a
whole the capital
Unlock document

This preview shows pages 1-3 of the document.
Unlock all 10 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

Outline -- the missing peace: stepping back from the abyss. 1999 both sides sood on sides of abyss and both sides stood back temporarily. Pa was reluctant to crack down on hamas bc arafat didn"t want to alienate that population. He began to realize that uncontrolled violence could push netanyahu to make no concessions at all, and make it impossible for labor to replace likud (netanyahu) 1986- began to crack down on hamas terrorism. Pa was willing to work with israel. Could the pa find an israeli partner that was more agreeable to talk w than netanyahu. The chances of finding a cooperative partner improved dramatically in 99. Leading israeli generals decided israel security needed rapid peace agreement and netanyahu was making it impossible. Ehud barak was most decorated in all of israel. Promised a breakthrough in the peace process. Promised to withdraw from south lebanon within a year. Revived some optimism that began with oslo in 93.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents