POLI 360 Lecture 2: POLI 360 - Lecture 2

5 Pages
81 Views
Unlock Document

Department
POLI - Political Science
Course
POLI 360
Professor
Darmofal
Semester
Spring

Description
POLI 360 – Lecture 2 Calculus of Voting (Riker and Ordeshook, 1968) Continued  If citizens behave logically (ex. engage in behavior that’s benefits outweigh its costs), then they should only vote if they have clear rewards from voting (ex. if R is positive). This analysis only examines the empirical standpoint, not the normative standpoint.  R will not be positive for most citizens since PB is almost equal to 0, and C is usually bigger than D.  It is, however, in the candidates’ benefits to convince their followers to vote and to create positive rewards for their supporters. Parties allow candidates to do this by influencing costs and benefits of voting.  Essentially, the calculus of voting leads to parties, which then influence costs and benefits to get elites elected.  Parties mobilize their supporters by reducing their costs of voting (C). For example, “get out the vote” efforts decrease supporters’ costs of transportation. Additionally, party advertising decreases supporters’ costs of gathering information. For instance, parties could provide supporters with basic campaign platforms for their candidates as well as locations of local polling places.  Parties also rally their followers by increasing their psychological benefits (D). For example, party rallies and conventions increase supporters’ attachments to the party and the party’s candidates. Parties also seek to paint the opposition party in the worst possible light.  Issue Ownership Issue: the idea that certain parties “own” certain issues. For example, Republicans “own” taxes and foreign policy. Parties diminish issues that their opposing party owns as well. For example, George W. Bush ran on the No Child Left Behind Act in 2001, reducing differences in educational policy between Republicans and Democrats. Ideally, Republicans believed that this would reduce Democratic motivation to vote since both parties appeared to have the same positive stance on education.  Aldrich argues that elites create parties to solve problems of ambition, social choice, and collective action.  A critique of Aldrich’s work is that it is too fixated on political elites and reduces citizens’ interests generating parties. Parties and Citizens’ Needs  Parties serve three principle interests of citizens: they make voting easier, they inform citizens, and they connect citizens to their government.  Informing Citizens o Studies show that citizens pay slight attention to politics and do not know many particulars about politics. This is not surprising, given the numerous strains on citizens’ time. o Parties offer information shortcuts to aid citizens’ decision making. These shortcuts pose no negative consequences for society, since shortcuts and “long- cuts” offer the same outcome, and citizens have the opportunity to save time as well. o Citizens know what parties stand for, so they can follow a simple party label and still vote for their interests. Essentially, citizens do not need to know specific candidates’ policy stances in order to vote.
More Less

Related notes for POLI 360

Log In


OR

Join OneClass

Access over 10 million pages of study
documents for 1.3 million courses.

Sign up

Join to view


OR

By registering, I agree to the Terms and Privacy Policies
Already have an account?
Just a few more details

So we can recommend you notes for your school.

Reset Password

Please enter below the email address you registered with and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Add your courses

Get notes from the top students in your class.


Submit