PHL 304 Lecture 10: 10.10 Goodridge

17 views2 pages
9 Mar 2017
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Goodridge v department of public health: background, not very strange. Have kids, and want same privileges and rights that heterosexuals have when they get married. Same privileges and rights as heterosexuals: decision of the lower court and its three reasons, when refused marriage license in lower courts,, they sued. There are other definitions of marriage, but this is a courtroom not a church. There are hundreds of statutes related to marriage and its benefits. There have been attempts to deny it to interracial couples. Marriage between same sex couples is protected by constitution. Any restriction on freedom must not be arbitrary or capricious: don"t need strict judicial scrutiny to see that it is capricious to not, each of those restrictions don"t meet a rational basis. The primary purpose of marriage is not procreation: marshall: strict judicial scrutiny allow same sex couples to marry, marshall rejection of each of the reasons personal decision.

Get access

Grade+20% off
$8 USD/m$10 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Grade+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
40 Verified Answers
Class+
$8 USD/m
Billed $96 USD annually
Class+
Homework Help
Study Guides
Textbook Solutions
Class Notes
Textbook Notes
Booster Class
30 Verified Answers

Related Documents