EALL 200 Lecture 5: Bryce Cleveland doing procedures in Phoenix

31 views1 pages

periwinkledolphin303

13 Oct 2016

School

Yale University

Department

East Asian Lang and Lit

Course

EALL 200

Professor

April Ruiz

For unlimited access to Class Notes, a Class+ subscription is required.

Bryce Cleveland doing procedures in Phoenix, Arizona

For Bryce Cleveland, it is evident that changing the lives of individuals is the first step to making

an impact to the world. Being the founder and CEO of Scalp Aesthetics, Bryce has actively

participated in changing the lives of over 20,000 people through offering training to the best

scalp micropigmentation technicians.

This time round, Bryce Cleveland is getting back into the game and is taking clients in Arizona.

This is after providing high quality services to his many clients in over 150 locations in the

world. The many locations he has worked on clearly shows his passion for his work apart from

ensuring reliable and convenient means for his clients to access the professional services from

his trained team of experts

In Arizona, Bryce Cleveland is doing the following procedures to his clients:

SMP for both women and men

For ladies, hair loss may occur in very minimal instances such as thinning. In such cases, you

may need to regrow your esteem and hence Bryce Cleveland will be readily available at your

service in Scottsdale Arizona. He will perform procedural scalp micropigmentation on you

leaving you having that awesome and cute look.

For men, it is quite obvious to have hair loss issues especially in the case of baldness. Hence for

quality hair replacement, Scalp Aesthetics has made their SMP procedures available in

Scottsdale and done by Bryce Cleveland himself.

Repair of previously conducted SMP procedure.

In case you have been a victim in the past for poorly done SMP procedures probably because the

procedure was performed by inexperienced technicians, then good news is that Bryce Cleveland

is now at your service in Scottsdale, adjacent to Phoenix, Arizona. He will assess your situation

at no cost and conduct the procedure professionally on you giving you the desired look you have

always dreamt of. All you need to do is contact him and he will personally come to serve you.

It is evident that Bryce Cleveland is known to offer high quality services in the above procedure

both in Scottsdale and the wider Phoenix, Arizona. Note should be taken that this has become

possible due to the tools he has developed on his own to use on the procedures. These include:

High quality machines

Quality machines are paramount in scalp micropigmentation procedure; Bryce Cleveland has

worked personally to develop the best machines for this task. His machines can deliver up to

5mm, making them the best for quality outcome. To gain access to the machine in Scottsdale,

you only need to contact him and he will supply you with the best and unique machine.

High quality needles

Moreover, Bryce Cleveland has developed his own safe and effective needles to use for the SMP

procedures for any kind of scalp. The needles are 75% smaller and hence smaller follicle

replications will be the outcome. Hence, visit scalp aesthetics in Scottsdale, Arizona and get the

chance to be served by Bryce himself using his own high quality needles.

Organic ink

To serve the people of Scottsdale, Arizona, Bryce has also come up with 100% organic ink for

use in scalp micropigmentation. His ink is organic and of high quality hence does not easily fade.

In conclusion therefore, if you are in Arizona, explore this opportunity of having Bryce himself

do your head.

Go back to listings

find more resources at oneclass.com

Unlock document

This preview shows half of the first page of the document.
Unlock all 1 pages and 3 million more documents.

Already have an account? Log in

Document Summary

For bryce cleveland, it is evident that changing the lives of individuals is the first step to making an impact to the world. Being the founder and ceo of scalp aesthetics, bryce has actively participated in changing the lives of over 20,000 people through offering training to the best scalp micropigmentation technicians. This time round, bryce cleveland is getting back into the game and is taking clients in arizona. This is after providing high quality services to his many clients in over 150 locations in the world. The many locations he has worked on clearly shows his passion for his work apart from ensuring reliable and convenient means for his clients to access the professional services from his trained team of experts. In arizona, bryce cleveland is doing the following procedures to his clients: For ladies, hair loss may occur in very minimal instances such as thinning.

Related Questions

I need a diferent point of view and someones opinion on this article.

Reforming the U.S. system of collective bargaining Collective bargaining procedures and relationships between labor and management must reflect less conflict, more cooperation as the Nation's economy struggles to meet international competition and domestic needs D. QUINN MILLS Rules as a productivity drain Rules alone cannot ensure that an organization will perform well. They may keep it from dissolving into self-defeating open warfare, but often do not permit it to achieve its potential. An organization which depends upon adherence to a myriad of rules will always be vulnerable to competition from other organizations which operate in a more consensual and cooperative fashion, even when the latter have fewer resources. And, although an organization of rules may sometimes pull it-self together to respond to an emergency, this need not necessarily occur. It follows, then, that primary dependence on establishing and enforcing rules is a very poor way to run an economic enterprise. The existence of a multitude of rules, many of which attempt to "stretch the work" to maintain jobs in ways reminiscent of depression-era tactics, constrains productivity and raises costs. For example, maintenance classifications may prohibit an employee from doing incidental work outside the strict limits of his or her trade; multiple job classifications may exist even where a person in a single combined classification could do the work effectively, without undue effort and stress; and, job classifications may be perpetuated although technological change has rendered the incumbents' work trivial. Other restrictions may limit the amount of work a person may be assigned, such as permitting a mechanic to open only two flanges. The location of materials and inventory may be restricted by contract or past practice to retain jobs in now-inefficient areas of the plant. In some cases, rules may prohibit employees being assigned work during breaks, and simultaneously prohibit supervisors from doing the employees' work, so that emergencies occurring at coffee breaks or lunchtime cannot be legally handled under the agreement. Over time, rules tend to become increasingly costly and constraining as technology, materials, products, and other aspects of production change. Even rules which made great sense at first become out-of-date under changing conditions. But the rules are difficult to change, and particular employees may be further benefited the more outdated the rules become. Sometimes a company can pay a high price and "buy the rules out," or a union can persuade some workers to give up favored positions for the good of the membership as a group. But often, change cannot be accomplished without a bitter struggle between management and labor. Furthermore, the rule making process promotes a set of attitudes which are inimical to successful enterprise. The existence of the rulebook encourages both management and labor to assert their rights under the contract, rather than to attempt to work out problems. It gives rise to "shop-floor lawyers," rather than problem solvers. It fosters conflict and controversy. It undermines trust. To a large degree, it seems that unions have become captives of their origins. Born in adversity and conflict, they continued to act as opponents of management even when their strength had become much greater. In some instances, unions have created thickets of rules in which to immobilize management, just as spiders build webs to ensnare prey. But when the thickets of rules have crippled productivity, the unions have discovered themselves to be caught alongside management in the trap. Plants have declined in competitiveness, and jobs have been lost. The unions have discovered too late that a snare is no less a snare because they have set it themselves. A prescription for change In a recent survey conducted by the Harris organization, a majority of the general public professed the belief that unions contribute less than they once did to the growth and efficiency of business. Not surprisingly, only 15 percent of union leaders agreed with this judgment.' The need for unions to assist companies in the light of increased foreign competition is apparent to the public. To the inhabitants of the Snow Belt, it is similarly evident that unions should cooperate with local business to stem the outflow of industry and jobs to the South and West. Public perceptions of a productivity problem are supported by Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates, which show particularly sluggish growth in output per labor hour after 1973.3 Collective bargaining practiced primarily as rule making has become self-defeating for both unions and management. It interferes with management's efficient operation of the enterprise, and ensnares employees with legitimate grievances in a web of red tape. It also contributes to the vehemence of employer attempts to resist union organization drives. Study after study of U.S. managers has shown that managers fear the imposition of restrictive work practices far more than the higher wages and benefits which unionization may bring. Companies' efforts to make competitive operations out of older plants often fail because changes in current work rules take the form of additional complex rules which do not provide the flexibility needed to turn a facility around. What management really needs is fewer rules altogether, and willing cooperation from the work force. The union, for its side, needs a management sensitive to the needs of people. Both are very difficult to obtain in the U.S. labor relations environment.

taupefrog166

EALL 200 Lecture 5: Bryce Cleveland doing procedures in Phoenix

Document Summary

Get access

Related Documents

SOSC 1510 Study Guide - Final Guide: Petro-Canada, Monetarism, Unemployment Benefits

Related Questions