HUMR 1001 Lecture Notes - Human Rights Watch

9 views4 pages

carletonstudent378

5 Apr 2023

School

Carleton University

Department

Human Rights

Course

HUMR 1001

Professor

For unlimited access to Study Guides, a Grade+ subscription is required.

Document Summary

To begin, the ethnic cleansing crisis regarding rohingya and myanmar has been an ongoing issue since 2016. They displaced over 700,000 migrants in other countries, a majority of them staying in bangladesh seeking refuge. Not only did they experience abuse, torture and being forced to leave their home - but now children are being refused to receive an education. On january 2019, in southeast bangladesh, officials have ordered secondary schools near the refugee settlements in the cox"s bazar district to dismiss rohingya students, who lack. Instead of having the government ensuring that these individuals are receiving their right to education, officials are tracking down and expelling rohingya refugees which is tragic and unlawful. The solution to children feeling compelled to falsify their identities to go to secondary school isn"t to expel them but to let them get the education they deserve. (human rights watch, The founder of leda high school said intelligence officials warned him that having.

Related Questions

. Vouchers to Pay Private School
Tuition
Two conditions that justify government intervention in a market are the presence of external benefits and equity concerns. Both of these issues are present in the case of primary and secondary education in the United States. Think about what education without government education would look like. In the absence of government intervention, all primary and secondary education in the US would be private. Public school districts would not exist. Parents would need to pay private firms (schools) to educate their children.

External benefits

If all education were private, itâs likely that people would buy too little education, from societyâs point of view. External benefits are one reason. When a child is educated, he or she benefits and we expect his or her parents to take those benefits into account when they purchase education. But there are additional benefits to society which parents may ignore. As people become more educated, they are less likely to be unemployed or be criminals and are more likely to volunteer and vote. The presence of these external benefits is an example in support for the government getting involved in education.

Equity

Many families in the United States have low incomes. Among all children in first through twelfth grades in 2001, 46% were from families with incomes below $40,000. Since the cost of private education would be an important share of these familiesâ incomes, most Americans would be concerned about the fairness of relying on markets to decide how much education children receive. Current spending by these families on private education provides some support for this concern. Of all children in private school in 2001, only 25% were from families with incomes below $40,000. Therefore, equity concerns are another example in support for government getting involved in education.

Providing vs. producing education

Most economists think external benefits and equity concerns justify government intervention in education. But it is important to distinguish between government production of education and other forms of government intervention. At the level of elementary and secondary education, K- 12 education, government intervention today mostly means production of education by local school districts. To benefit, children must attend public schools. But this is not the only form intervention could take.
There are other markets where government intervention takes the form of subsidizing peopleâs access to productsâthink of financial aid to college students, for example. Many people in the US think that government should move from producing education to subsidizing access.

One form that subsidy could take is government providing vouchers to parents. Parents would use the voucher to help pay for their childâs education in a private school. After it receives the voucher, the school would turn it in and be paid by a local or state government.

Today there is a lively debate between people who think K-12 education should be delivered publicly and people who think quality and efficiency would be higher if government provided vouchers and the education was delivered by private schools. Some of these quality and efficiency arguments can be based on material we covered this week. Price competition between private schools will pressure each one to produce efficiently. Competition for students will lead private schools to offer programs of interest to parents and their children.

Answer the questions below and make use of the sources supplied. Be sure to cite you sources in your answers.

1. Explain whether a potential exit by students with vouchers will lead to the improvement of public schools. 2. Discuss whether the implementation of vouchers will lead the best students to leave public school, which could lead to a decline in education for the students left behind in the public schools. 3. Consider what might happen to the students who use vouchers to leave public schools in order to attend private schools. How might their academic performance change as a result of switching? 4. Finally, think about the impact of a voucher system on the students in an urban setting. Describe whether all families would have an equal opportunity to access education.

Your final product will be a paper that: ? Addresses each of the four questions above in total. ? Is APA formatted. ? The body is to be 2 pages minimum.

The requirements for your assignment are: 1. Answer each question fully 2. Define the overall subject of each question. 3. Cite at least three (3) resources from this weekâs materials.

Policy makers in the Canadian government have long tried to write laws that encourage growth in per capita real GDP. These laws typically do one of three things:

a. They encourage firms to invest more in research and development in order to boost technology.

b. They encourage individuals to save more in order to boost the physical capital stock.

c. They encourage individuals to invest more in education in order to boost the stock of human capital.

For each of the above three points, name a law or government program with that intention.

Instructions: You may select more than one answer.

a. They encourage firms to invest more in research and development in order to boost technology.

Health savings accounts.

Government-provided student loans.

Grants from National Science Foundation.

529 education savings accounts.

Lower tax rates on income earned through savings.

Grants from National Institute of Health.

Tax credits for R&D costs.

Education subsidies for veterans.

Government grants patents for inventions.

Retirement savings plans.

Establish a system of public schools and universities.

b. They encourage individuals to save more in order to boost the physical capital stock.

Health savings accounts.

Government grants patents for inventions.

Retirement savings plans.

Establish a system of public schools and universities.

Grants from National Institute of Health.

Government-provided student loans.

Education subsidies for veterans.

Grants from National Science Foundation.

Tax credits for R&D costs.

529 education savings accounts.

Lower tax rates on income earned through savings.

c. They encourage individuals to invest more in education in order to boost the stock of human capital.

Government grants patents for inventions.

Tax credits for R&D costs.

Grants from National Institute of Health.

Grants from National Science Foundation.

Lower tax rates on income earned through savings.

Retirement savings plans. Health savings accounts.

529 education savings accounts.

Establish a system of public schools and universities.

Government-provided student loans.

Education subsidies for veterans.

Please answer the below questions.I only have 1 hours beforesubmit.Please!

Questions

1. Should the Federal Government question an educationalinstitution on its recruiting practices?

2. Should the Federal Government also question State and PrivateUniversityâs retention practices?

3. Shouldnât these companies be able to operate as a business-that is- making money the aggressive way?

4. Who are the stakeholders in this situation?

What is the ethical dilemma and duty in this matter

For Profit for Education? Putting Profits over PublicGood? Contd...

For-profit colleges in the US came under increased scrutiny onseveral counts. This case study describes the problems faced byâfor-profit collegesâ in the US such as high loandefault rates, vague accreditation standards, and low graduationand job placement rates. Complaints such as overpriced degrees,misleading claims, and increasing level of student debt resulted inthe government turning its attention to the entire for-profitcollege sector. According to some reports, too much taxpayer moneywas being used to generate profits for the colleges, instead ofproviding students with useful high-quality education. The casealso focuses on the alleged fraudulent practices adopted byfor-profit colleges in the US to gain access to more federalfinancial aid.

The Study

Concerned about the disproportionate percentage of federalstudent aid flowing to âfor-profit collegesâ, someanalysts began raising questions about the rapid growth of thefor-profit education sector, the aggressive recruitment ofstudents, and the value of the education provided by suchinstitutions.

There are strategies followed by âfor-profitcollegesâ in the US to attract more students. According toa report released by US Government Accountability Office (GAO),some for-profit colleges in the US were involved in deceptivepractices and had made misleading statements to prospectivestudents which included not providing clear information about thecollege's graduation rate, applicant's likely salary aftergraduation, accreditation of the school, and the duration and costsof the programs offered by the schools. This study concludes bydetailing the new regulations proposed by the federal governmentfor the âfor-profitâ education sector in order to safeguardstudents from misleading recruitment practices and incurring hugedebts, among other issues. This study also focus on studentenrollments and the methods these colleges were adopting to attractmore students.

On release of the GAO report, the shares of for-profit educationcompanies in the US, including Apollo Group Inc. (Apollo Groupâowner of University of Phoenix), DeVry Inc. (DeVry), EducationManagement Corp, and Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (Corinthian), fellsignificantly. "GAO's findings make it disturbingly clear thatabuses in âfor-profitâ recruiting are not limited to a few roguerecruiters or even a few schools with lax oversight.

To the contrary, the evidence points to a problem that issystemic to the for-profit industry,"⁹ said Tom Harkin(Harkin), Chairman, US Senate Health, Education, Labor, andPensions (HELP) Committee.

The GAO defined for-profit colleges as "institutions ofpost-secondary education that are either privately owned or ownedby a public traded company and whose net earnings can benefit ashareholder or individual."...

In May 2010, the GAO began its investigation of 15 for-profitschools in six states (Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois,Pennsylvania, and Texas and Washington, D.C (Refer to Exhibit IIIfor a list of the schools probed)...

High Tuition Fee
The report stated that the tuition fee at for-profit colleges washigh compared to similar programs at other public colleges.Investigators found that on an average, the fee for an associatedegree program was between 6 and 13 times higher at a for-profitschool than at a public college while a bachelor's degree at afor-profit college cost almost twice that in local publicinstitutions...

Deceptive Recruitment and Marketing Tactics
According to the report, campus officials of all 15 colleges misledpotential students and made deceptive statements about theirprograms' cost, quality, and duration, and the average salary ofgraduates (Refer to Exhibit V for some examples of deceptivepractices of for-profit institutions) For-profit colleges generallypaid recruiters by the number of enrollments that theygenerated...

Loan Defaults
For-profit colleges, which accounted for 10% of all collegestudents in the US as of 2009, derived three-fourth of theirrevenues from federal grants and loans. In 2009, at 14 for-profitschools, federal aid totaled 87% of revenue in 2009...

HUMR 1001 Lecture Notes - Human Rights Watch

Document Summary

Get access

Related Questions