1
answer
2
watching
1,042
views

Sun Air Boat Builders, Inc

Sun Air Boat Builders served boaters with a small, lightweightfiberglass sailboat capable of being carried on a car roof. Thoughthe firm could hardly be considered as one of the nation’sindustrial giants, its burgeoning business had required it toinstitute a formal system of cost control. Jan Larson, Sun Air’sPresident, explained:

Our seasonal demand, as opposed to a need for regular, levelproduction, means that we must keep a good line of credit at thebank. Modern cost control and inventory valuation proceduresenhance our credibility with the bankers and, more importantly,have enabled them to improve our operations. Our supervisors haverealized the value of good cost accounting, and the main officehas, In turn, become much more aware of problems in the barn.

Sun Air’s manufacturing andwarehouse facilities consisted of three historic barns converted tomake 11 -foot “silver Streak” sailboats. The company’s plansincluded the addition of 15-and 18-foot sailboats to its presentline. Longer-term plans called for adding additional sizes andstyles in the hope of becoming a major factor in the regional boatmarket.

The “Silver Streak ” was anopen--cockpit,day sailer sporting a mainsail and small jib on a17-foot,telescoping aluminum mast.It was ideally suited to the manysmall lakes and ponds of the region,and after three years it hadbecome quite popular. It was priced at $2,265 complete.

Manufacturing consisted basicallyof three processes: molding, finishing, and assembly. The moldingdepartment mixed all ingredients to make the fiberglass hull,performed the actual molding, and removed the hull from the mold.Finishing included hand additions to the hull for running andstanding rigging, reinforcement of the mast and tiller steps, andgeneral sanding of rough spots. Assembly consisted of theattachment of cleats, turnbuckles, drain plugs, tiller, and soforth, and the inspection of the boat with mast, halyards, andsails in place. The assembly department also prepared the boat forstorage or shipment.

Mixing and molding fiberglasshulls, while manually simple, required a great deal of expertise,or “eyeball,” as it was known in the trade.. Addition of too muchor too little catalyst, use of too much or too little heat, orfailure to allow proper time for curing could each cause a hull tobe discarded. Conversely, spending too much time on adjustments tomixing or molding equipment o on “personalized” supervision of eachhull could cause severe underproduction problems. Once a batch offiberglass was mixed there was no time to waste being overcautiousor it was likely to “freeze ”in its kettle..

With such a situation, and thecompany’s announced intent of expanding its product line, it becameobvious that a standard cost system would be necessary to helpcontrol costs and to provide some reference for supervisors’performance.

Randy Kern, the moldingdepartment supervisor, and Bill Schmidt, Sun Air ’s accountant,agreed after lengthy discussion to the following standardcosts:

Materials -Glass cloth 120 sq.ft @$2.00 = $240.00

-Glass mix 40lbs. .@$3.75 = 150.00

Directlabor -Mixing 0.5 hr..@$20.25 = 10.12

-Molding 1.0 hr..@$20.25 = 20.25

Indirect costs -Absorb at $24.30 per hull *= 24.30

Total cost to mold hull $444.67

* The normal volume of operationsfor overhead derivation purposes was assumed to be 450 hulls permonth.

The estimated monthly indirectcost equation was: Budget = $9.72 * hulls + $6,561

Analysis of Operations

After several additional months of operations, Bill Schmidtexpressed his disappointment about the apparent lack of attentionbeing paid to the standard costs. The molders tended to have acautious outlook toward mixing too little or “cooking” too long. Noone wanted to end up throwing away a partial hull because there wastoo little glass mix.

In reviewing the most recentmonth ’s production results, Schmidt noted the following actualcosts for production of 430 hulls:

Materials:

Purchased 60,000 sq. ft glass cloth @$1.80

20,000 lbs. glass mix @$4.09

Used 54,000 sq. ft. glass cloth

19,000 lbs. glass mix

Direct Labor: Mixing 210 hrs. @$21.37

Molding 480 hrs @$20.25

Overhead :Incurred $11,140

Before proceeding with furtheranalysis, Schmidt called Kern to arrange a discussion of variances.He also told Jan Larson, “Maybe we should look into an automatedmolding operation. Although I haven’t finished my analysis, itlooks like there will be unfavorable variances again. Kern insiststhat the standards are reasonable, then never meetsthem!”

Larson seemed disturbed and answered, “Well, some variances areinevitable. Why don’t you analyze them in some meaningful mannerand discuss your ideas with Kern, who is an expert in molding whoseopinion I respect. Then the two of you meet with me to discuss thewhole matter.”

Questions

1. Determine the molding department’sdirect cost variances and overhead variances. Why do you think theyoccurred?

2. Do you think Sun Air’s standards aremeaningful? How would you improve them?

3. Assume that the month’s actual andstandard production costs for items other than molding hullsamounted to $914.33 per boat, and that 430 boats were sold. Preparea statement of budgeted and actual gross margin for the month,assuming planned sales of 450 boats.

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Deanna Hettinger
Deanna HettingerLv2
28 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in