Log in
Economics
1
answer
0
watching
46
views

  1. Q1)What is anticipatory repudiation? Why is it important to be able to identify this type of a breach? How does it benefit the non-breaching party?

    1. Q2)What are the elements of negligence? What kind of damages are available under a negligence claim?

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
46
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Nusrat Fatima
Nusrat FatimaLv10
30 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

We know that a contract consists of offer, acceptance, and legal consideration. However, are each of those steps enforceable? If so, what happens if a party breaches a contract? In addition, can offers and acceptance be withdrawn? How? If those elements are not withdrawn, and the contract becomes enforceable, what are the available remedies for the non-breaching party? What is the maximum recovery amount in a legal remedy? Please discuss.

Following an automobile accident, a 46-year-old man was brought to the hospital emergency department by an ambulance. The patient seemed to be alert, was able to answer questions, and claimed to be suffering from a great deal of pain. The physician administered 15 milligrams of morphine intravenously. The patient needed blood but refused a transfusion. After being observed in the emergency department for several hours, the patient was placed on a medical-surgical unit for observation. The following morning, he was unresponsive, and he was eventually pronounced dead. It was later discovered that he had a long history of drug and alcohol abuse. The night of the accident, he had injected heroin and drank several shots of tequila and multiple cans of beer. He had not disclosed any of this to the doctors or nurses treating him. Several years later, his estate sued the physician, claiming medical malpractice.

Analyze the potential success of a claim for negligence under one of the three possible scenarios. Include a detailed discussion of each element of the negligence claim and why that element is met or not met. Discuss the possible defenses that could be reasonably asserted by the doctor to each claim, and why that defense might apply. Lastly, include a paragraph describing which, if any, claim you believe might be the most successful against the doctor and why.

Learning Activity 1

This assignment focuses on UCC contracts.

Scenario: Landmark Company is a US-based business that sells iron tables to retailers in the US. The tables are purchased from individual metalsmiths, from US wholesale suppliers, and suppliers in Mexico.

Landmark ordered by telephone 300 iron tables to be shipped by April 1 from Metal Elements, Inc., another US company. No other sales terms were discussed. Landmark followed up the telephone call with an email to Metal Elements confirming the number of tables in the order and the delivery date, but did not discuss price. Metal Elements did not respond but shipped the tables as ordered to Landmark by April 1 at a price of $700 each, totaling $210,000.

Landmark’s new Director of Purchasing, Payton Mann, is concerned about whether Landmark is bound to accept the tables from Metal Elements since Landmark had no formal acceptance or written correspondence Metal Elements. Payton is also concerned about the price of the tables which is higher than she had expected to pay. She emails you, one of the Landmark owners, to explain the situation with Metal Elements and to seek your advice about the sales.

Respond to Payton via email including:

A. An analysis and explanation of whether this is a valid contract between Landmark and Metal Elements, and why or why not; suggest to Payton how this situation should be handled;

B. For Payton’s future information, include in the email a hypothetical situation in which the same facts apply as in the Landmark – Metal Elements order except that, upon inspection, fifty of the tables delivered from Metal Elements were damaged; provide an analysis of Landmark’s options and suggestions for resolving this situation with Metal Elements.

Sources: Saylor: Advanced Business Law and the Legal Environment

Chapter 8: Formation of Sales and Lease Contracts, Uniform Commercial Code, Contracts for Sale of International Goods (CISG)

Chapter 9: Title, Risk and Insurable Interest

Chapter 10: Performance, Breach of Sales Contracts and Remedies

Chapter 11: Sections 11.1-11.7 (Warranties and Product Liability)

Week 5 Overview

SALES AND LEASE CONTRACTS

Formation of Sales and Lease Contracts, Uniform Commercial Code, Contracts for Sale of International Goods (CISG)

Introduction: Contracts for the sale and lease of goods are based primarily on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), rather than common law contract principles. UCC Article 2 and Article 2A govern contract formation for the sale and lease of goods. The goal of the UCC is to provide a relatively simple, straightforward guide to commercial transactions without the formality and inflexibility required to validly form other types of contracts. The UCC has been adopted in all states; Louisiana has not adopted Articles 2 and 2A. Because globalization has increased the scope and number of international sales transactions, the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is a model uniform law that applies for those nations that have adopted it.

Title, Risk, and Insurable Interest

Introduction: The UCC addresses and clarifies the concepts of identification of specific goods to a contract, when risk of loss for goods passes from a seller to a buyer, and which party to a sales contract holds an insurable interest in goods. Under the UCC, typically title and risk of loss for the goods in a specific transaction pass from a seller or lessor to a buyer or lessee according to specific terms in the contract between the parties. Parties to sales and lease agreements often have insurance to protect against damage, loss, or destruction of goods.

Performance, Breach of Sales Contracts, Remedies

Introduction: Under a sales or lease contract subject to the UCC, the seller or lessor has the basic duty to transfer and deliver the goods according to the contract terms, and the buyer or lessee has the basic duty to accept and pay for the goods. Parties may also be bound to implied terms based on customs within an industry, or based on prior contracts and dealings between the parties. When a contract is breached, the non-breaching party has available remedies under the law, such as retaining the goods or requiring the breaching party to perform under the contract. As with common law contract principles, remedies are designed to put the non-breaching party in essentially the same position as if the contract had not been breached.

Warranties and Product Liability

Introduction: A warranty is a promise, or guarantee, by a seller or lessor that certain facts are true of the goods being sold or leased. Types of warranties include (1) warranties of title guaranteeing that the goods have clear and valid title, (2) express warranties promising specific facts about the goods, and (3) implied warranties of merchantability, or fitness for a particular purpose. A warranty creates a legal duty for the seller or lessor; a non-breaching party can recover damages for breach of warranty(ies). Because warranties are associated with the sale or lease of products, breach of warranty claims are a part of product liability claims and manufacturers and sellers of goods can be held liable for breach of warranty for defective products. Warranties are subject to regulation under the UCC, product liability tort law, contract law, and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

Comparison of Common Law vs. UCC Contracts

Introduction: Common law contract principles are stringent, specific, relatively rigid and rules-laden, and require clarity in the formation and performance of agreements. Common law contract rules focus on protecting the rights and interests of parties to an agreement. UCC contract principles are more flexible, looser, permit implied terms in agreements, focus on “keeping the deal together”, and expediting business transactions. The UCC rules rely on prior dealings between the parties, customs within an industry, and reasonableness to complete contracts that may have omitted or implied terms. Both common law and UCC principles are based on fairness for the parties, and provide remedies, such as compensatory damages or specific performance, for contract breach. The goal of remedies for breach under both common law and the UCC contracts is to restore the non-breaching party to essentially the same position as if there had been no breach.

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in