Log in
Economics
1
answer
0
watching
79
views

Stereotypes and Motivation

1.) Name one stereotype you have heard about government employees.

2.) Offer your personal thought and opinion as to whether or not this stereotype is generally true.

3.) Motivation: Consider your own aspiration to work in government or in a non-profit. Share what motivates you to pursue this path for your life.

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
79
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Retselisitsoe Pokothoane
Retselisitsoe PokothoaneLv10
28 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

You may have heard that your job is only as good as your supervisor. How true that is. I've had few good bosses and many bad ones. Those experiences have helped me as a boss. This week should be kind of fun. I would like you to share some of your experiences. Tell us about one of the bosses you had that you thought was really good; or perhaps one that you had that was not so good. These can be people you work with now or have worked for in the past.

Q. Write your opinion about the below paragraph? Also, mention any example?

Topic: Your accountant has just told you that your company is losing money. Why might you decide to stay in business anyway?

I would decide to stay in the business because in the short run most costs are fixed in nature. If the business is wound up even then committed fixed cost (unavoidable cost) will continue. After winding up, it is difficult to restart the same business as it would require huge capital and will have fewer customers' confidence.

Whereas if the business is continued during loss or boom period, the business can recover the variable cost (avoidable) and some contribution towards the fixed costs.

Therefore I will consider some situations like shut down or break-even point.

Break-even point is a level of output for a price where firms do not make loss or profit.

Shutdown point occurs when the price of the product is comparatively very low to average total cost (ATC). In this scenario, temporary shut down is the good option.

Q. Write your opinion about the below paragraph? Also, mention any example?

Government bailouts are both good and bad. Good because it infuses cash into the company and instead of all their costs being sunk costs, they can recover some of the capital spent on the government bail out. Moreover, with new capital manufacturers could resume production. However, infusing cash artificially into the system could lead to waste as some managers would to be lazy and not actively adopt cost-saving methods. However, the chances of economic inefficiency during the 2002 bailout would have been low since with government bailouts there was tight oversight and the manufacturing companies were under pressure to bounce-back quickly. So firms bailed out during that period laid off a lot of employees and cut down wages to save costs. This type of drastic cost saving methods can disrupt the optimal level of production along the expansion path, as the labor vs. capital changes would disproportionate.

HELP! PLEASE HELP!!... The City of Ocelot was recently incorporated and is developing its administrative systems. A major motivation for creating the new city was the perception that the county commissioners had been less than enthusiastic about providing services to an area that tended to vote for their opponents. One pressing problem that requires immediate attention has been inadequate drainage. Unexpectedly high rainfall the last two years has generated large mosquito populations, and citizens have indicated a willingness to support taxation required for the construction of an expanded drainage system plus other measures to deal with the insects. Although the bulk of mosquito breeding occurs in the poorer parts of town, the wealthier areas are within the flight range of the insects. The population of Ocelot is about 30,000 with a range of incomes from very wealthy to about 10% of the population below the poverty level. Housing ranges from high-end homes and condominiums to publicly subsidized apartments. The ethnic distribution of the population is 65% Anglo-American, 15% Hispanic-American, 15% African-American, 3% Asian-American, and 2% Native American. The concept of public goods is frequently offered as a motivation for governmental operations. Discuss how the situation in the scenario illustrates demand for public goods, including the free-rider concept in relation to taxation. The discipline of public administration has traditionally called for separating policy from politics. Deborah Stone argues in The Policy Paradox that the “rationality project” has failed, but this view is not shared by Kraft & Furlong or Kettl. Discuss how politics will influence the development of the drainage project for the City of Ocelot, and relate the readings to the scenario. Which author(s) do you believe offers the most insightful representation of the forces involved in the scenario, and explain your answer? A group of citizens is calling for the new city to be run “like a business” in the expectation this will lead to more efficient and effective delivery of services. Discuss the applicability of private sector techniques to the development of the drainage project for the city. In particular, what are some of the similarities and differences between the public and private sectors that will affect the project? One way to approach this may be to compare the constraints and incentives for Ocelot Director of Public Works Danny Velinski to those for Louis Sedgwick, CEO of a private sector construction company bidding for the contract. Two distinguished professors of organizational theory are eager to study the development of the new City’s administrative system. Dr. Virgil Hilts emphasizes systems theory in his analysis while Dr. Bob Hendley approaches organizations from the human relations school of thought. Discuss how each professor will approach operations in terms of the factors they will consider important in their analysis, and offer your view of the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. Which perspective do you believe offers greater explanation?

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in