Should the United States actually reduce cheap imports from foreign countries via tariffs, quotas, or other non-tariff barriers?
Are such tariffs, quotas, and other restraints on trade a good response to U.S. trade deficits? Why or why not from a welfare perspective?
Are "trade wars easy to win"?
Should the United States actually reduce cheap imports from foreign countries via tariffs, quotas, or other non-tariff barriers?
Are such tariffs, quotas, and other restraints on trade a good response to U.S. trade deficits? Why or why not from a welfare perspective?
Are "trade wars easy to win"?
For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.
Related textbook solutions
Related questions
Problems and Applications Q4
Consider trade relations between the United States and Mexico. Assume that the leaders of the two countries believe the payoffs to alternative trade policies are shown in the following payoff matrix:
Ā | United States' Decision | ||
Low Tariffs | High Tariffs | ||
Mexico's Decision | Low Tariffs | $25 billion, $25 billion | $10 billion, $30 billion |
High Tariffs | $30 billion, $10 billion | $20 billion, $20 billion |
The dominant strategy for the United States is to always choose tariffs. The dominant strategy for Mexico is to always choose tariffs.
True or False: The Nash equilibrium outcome for trade policy is for the United States to have high tariffs and Mexico to have low tariffs.
Ā
In 1993, the U.S. Congress ratified the North American Free Trade Agreement, in which the United States and Mexico agreed to reduce trade barriers simultaneously.
True or False: Given the trade strategy decisions in the table, the United States is worse off and Mexico is better off with this new trade policy.
Ā
Based on your understanding of the gains from trade (discussed in Chapters 3 and 9), which of the following statements accurately characterize how well the payoffs indicated for the four possible outcomes actually reflect a nation's welfare? Check all that apply.
The payoffs in the upper right and lower left corners of the matrix reflect a nation's welfare because the nation with lower tariffs is better off since that nation is more open to trade.
The payoffs in the upper right and lower left corners of the matrix do not reflect a nation's welfare because tariffs hurt the overall total surplus, so both countries' welfare should decline regardless of who charges the high and low tariffs.
The payoffs in the upper left and lower right corners of the matrix reflect a nation's welfare because they show that trade is beneficial and tariffs are a barrier to trade.