1
answer
0
watching
298
views

Consider a piece of property that is jointly owned by two individuals (owner 1 and owner 2€), each of whom owns a one-half share. Suppose that in order to sell owner 1 requires $3,000 for his half share, but owner 2 requires $6,000 for her half share. A buyer arrives and offers $10,000 for the entire piece of jointly owned property.

If the two owners can bargain with each other at no cost, will a sale occur between the owners and the buyer in this case (assuming both owners have to give their consent)? (Enter Yes€ or No€)

Suppose instead that the two owners cannot bargain with each other (for example, they are a divorcing couple).

If each is entitled to one-half of the sale proceeds, will a sale occur in this case? (Enter Yes or No)

Assuming sale proceeds would be equally split between owner 1 and owner 2, is it Pareto efficient for owner 1 to force the sale of the entire parcel of jointly owned property, provided the law provided him with a right to do so? (Enter Yes€ or No€)

Assuming sale proceeds would be equally split between owner 1 and owner 2, is it Kaldor-Hicks efficient for owner 1 to force the sale of the entire parcel of jointly owned property, provided the law provided him with a right to do so? (Enter Yes€ or No€)

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Joshua Stredder
Joshua StredderLv10
28 Sep 2019

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in