Log in
Economics
1
answer
0
watching
171
views

All of the following are potential problems with adopting the gold standard except:
 
(i) It would eliminate the government's ability to conduct fiscal policy.
(ii) It would eliminate the government's ability to conduct monetary policy.
(iii) Gold has no intrinsic value, so the system would be no more stable than our current system.
(iv) The world's need for more money may increase faster than the supply of gold.

 

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
171
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Irving Heathcote
Irving HeathcoteLv2
17 Mar 2020

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Principles of Economics
2nd Edition, 2017
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172364
Principles of Macroeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172388
Principles of Microeconomics
2 Edition,
Openstax
ISBN: 9781947172340

Related questions

Question is this -How government intervenes in the economy from three perspectives: Fiscal, Monetary, and Supply Side efforts. You have also now looked at the criticisms of government involvement from the Classical perspective. Which approach makes the most sense to you?

Comment on this answer...

This is Answer-After learning about the classical economic viewpoint and the criticisms of government from it, I don't think there is one single approach that makes the most sense to me between fiscal, monetary, and supply-side policies. I think a minimal mix of the three is okay, and for each, they have their own given situations where they may work best in comparison to the others, or even work in conjunction with one another.

Increasing aggregate demand through fiscal policy may help the economy with unemployment and price levels, or it may hurt the economy instead and leave it in a worse state than it was previously found to be at. This could create artificial demand where there isn't true demand from the consumers. This could trick business and mess them up.

Controlling the supply of money through monetary policy may be helpful to the economy for taming inflation and keeping price stability. Controlling it too much could cause problems such as market unpredictability, which in turn could cause mixed results such as to scare people away or draw them into borrowing less or more money.

Increasing supply through supply-side policies may help the economy with unemployment and price levels. It could hurt people in ways such as people not receiving federal funding, or receive less of it (budget cuts in whatever that may be) due to tax cuts, exemptions, etc., from the government to businesses.

With these three perspectives in mind, I would prefer to see a more classical approach to economic situations. The perspectives of fiscal, monetary, and supply-side policy I think can each be helpful but would be best if they didn't have to be implemented in the first place. They have the potential to cause damage to the economy. After watching the classical economics video and reading the chapter, one thing that stood out to me and I think summarizes government involvement from a classical economists viewpoint is the government's role is like being the umpire in a baseball game. They should make sure everyone plays by the rules and only enters the game as a last resort. That approach makes sense to me.

3. Please list the 4 key supply side growth factors we discussed, and discuss their viability in terms of getting our economy growing again, given that today our economy is not growing.

a. The slides should provide you with what you need here.

b. The issue of viability – if the economy is growing slowly or not at all, do we have any chance of achieving success with each of the 4 growth factors? What will likely cause us problems? What approaches could we use to increase our odds of success? You need to think carefully on this one.

4. Creative problem solving

Scenario #1:

The rate of growth in the US economy is currently 0.5% annually. Your mission is to increase our growth rate to at least 4% annually, without setting off unacceptable levels of inflation. You have the tools of fiscal and monetary policy available.

a. Present your solution to the problem – write it down first.

i. Strategy for creating your solution:

1. First identify a specific natural resource and think through how having more of it or a better quality of it could lead to significantly increasing the GDP growth rate.

2. This will lead you to a general solution to the problem.

3. Write it down! The explanation of the solution should take at least one good paragraph!

4. Determine what will be required to make the solution happen, typically it is money.

5. Think of ways to use your fiscal and monetary policy tools to get the needed money.

6. To attack the problem you must select at least one Monetary Policy tool and one Fiscal Policy tool.

b. Write down the names of the one fiscal policy tool and the one monetary policy tools you picked.

i. Remember – for this question you need one Fiscal Policy tool and one Monetary Policy tool.

c. Explain why you picked the tools that you picked and why you did not select the other choices.

i. Specifically explain what is good about the tool you selected and what is not so good about the tools

you did not select? Do this for

both the monetary and fiscal policy tool that you selected. The key here is to use some decision criteria in making your choice.

d.,Thoroughly and completely explain how your solution would work to solve the problem. You must include and explain the use of your monetary and fiscal policy tools and indicate the impact your solution would have on the key economic variables. Please present your answer using a chain of events format. Be specific. I need to see the detail.

MBA502, Economics for Business

Apply and Discover 7.2

You are responsible for economic policymaking in your country. Your desire is to eliminate inflation, keeping prices absolutely stable at P = 100, no matter what happens to output. Currently, the economy is in equilibrium at Q = 3200 (where Q = potential GDP) and P = 100. You can use monetary and fiscal policies to affect aggregate demand but you cannot affect aggregate supply in the short run. How would you respond to the following scenarios?

Explain and illustrate how each of these events would affect aggregate demand, aggregate supply, and prices, then explain how you would respond with economic policies.

1. A surprise increase in investment spending

In the short run, when investment spending increases, it results in an increase in Aggregate Demand (AD), which in turn pushes up both GPD and the price index.

To counterbalance this development, government might pursue contractionary fiscal policy by increasing taxes (to reduce consumption) or decreasing its own investment and spending so that the AD curve shifts back to its original position. Alternatively, the government can pursue contractionary monetary policy by reducing money supply and increasing interest rate to discourage economic activity.

2. Catastrophic floods that cause a sharp food price increase

In this case, sharp food shortages and consequent price increases cause a shock-type adjustment of the aggregate supply curve (it shift up and to the left). The result is a lower GDP and a higher price level.

The government cannot do anything to adjust AS in the short run. However, if the goal is to maintain the price level constant, the government can decide to do something to decrease the aggregate demand to force prices to come down, though it will be accompanies by another contraction in GDP and so it would not be a smart thing to do.

To cause AD to decrease, the government, similar to example above, can pursue fiscal policy (increase taxes, decrease spending) or monetary policy (reduce supply of money to the economy and thus increase interest rates).

3. A productivity decline that reduces potential output

In this case, AS shifts to the left, as was the case in example 2. As a result, price levels go up, as the same amount of money is chasing the reduced amount of goods and services, and GDP declines.

Government remedies here would be centered about causing AD to decrease through contractionary fiscal (higher taxes, lower spending) or monetary (reduce money supply and increase interest rates) policy. Again, this decision reduces inflation but at expense of GDP, as real output shrinks further.

4. A deep depression in East Asia that causes a sharp decrease in net exports to the United States

A decrease in exports of goods to from the United States to Asia will mean that the aggregate demand (which includes net exports

Show transcribed image text

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Economics 400,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in