Consider XYZ Bank that is established with $1500bn of deposits and $I000bn of equity. Its assets are some investments that are expected to pay off $2750bn in 1 years’ time. Suppose the rate of interest on safe assets is 10% a year and there is no risk premium to hold risky assets like XYZ Bank's investments.
- Suppose very shortly after being established the bank finds that it has been too optimistic
And now expects its investments to pay off $2475bn in 1 year time. What is the return to equity in the bank?
- -25%
- -50%
- -87.5%
- -100%
- None of A-D
- Suppose instead that the bank's liabilities were initially $2000bn of deposits with the rest
Being equity. Now what is the return to equity if the expected pay off of its investments falls to $2475bn in 1 year time?
- -25%
- -50%
- -87.5%
- -100%
- None of A-D
- Now suppose in the scenario of question 2 that very shortly after being established the
Bank finds that it has been too optimistic and now expects its investments to pay off $2475bn
In 1 year time and that the market now requires a premium of 10% a year to hold risky assets
Like XYZ Banks's investments. Now what is the return to equity?
- -25%
- -50%
- -87.5%
- -100%
- None of A-D
- Now suppose in the case Of question 3 that 'the bank's investment 'falls further, so that very
Shortly after being established the bank finds that it now expects its investments to pay
Off $2200bn in 1 year time and that the market now requires a premium of 10% a year to
Hold risky assets like XYZ Bank's investments, suppose now that the owners of the bank
Have an investment opportunity that will cost $500bn today and was certain to pay off the value
$1000bn in one year's time. Would the risk-neutral owners of the bank choose to put this?
Investment through the bank or would they prefer to invest in the project themselves using
Their own private funds?
- Not undertake the investment
- Undertake investment through 'the bank
- Undertake investment using private funds
- None of A-C
Consider XYZ Bank that is established with $1500bn of deposits and $I000bn of equity. Its assets are some investments that are expected to pay off $2750bn in 1 years’ time. Suppose the rate of interest on safe assets is 10% a year and there is no risk premium to hold risky assets like XYZ Bank's investments.
- Suppose very shortly after being established the bank finds that it has been too optimistic
And now expects its investments to pay off $2475bn in 1 year time. What is the return to equity in the bank?
- -25%
- -50%
- -87.5%
- -100%
- None of A-D
- Suppose instead that the bank's liabilities were initially $2000bn of deposits with the rest
Being equity. Now what is the return to equity if the expected pay off of its investments falls to $2475bn in 1 year time?
- -25%
- -50%
- -87.5%
- -100%
- None of A-D
- Now suppose in the scenario of question 2 that very shortly after being established the
Bank finds that it has been too optimistic and now expects its investments to pay off $2475bn
In 1 year time and that the market now requires a premium of 10% a year to hold risky assets
Like XYZ Banks's investments. Now what is the return to equity?
- -25%
- -50%
- -87.5%
- -100%
- None of A-D
- Now suppose in the case Of question 3 that 'the bank's investment 'falls further, so that very
Shortly after being established the bank finds that it now expects its investments to pay
Off $2200bn in 1 year time and that the market now requires a premium of 10% a year to
Hold risky assets like XYZ Bank's investments, suppose now that the owners of the bank
Have an investment opportunity that will cost $500bn today and was certain to pay off the value
$1000bn in one year's time. Would the risk-neutral owners of the bank choose to put this?
Investment through the bank or would they prefer to invest in the project themselves using
Their own private funds?
- Not undertake the investment
- Undertake investment through 'the bank
- Undertake investment using private funds
- None of A-C