Question

QUESTION 32

What did the old tort theorists conclude was the overriding question that the “old law” asked, in accord with their assumptions regarding it?

		How did one know when a customer must be identified as the recipient of the costs?
		How did the parties agree to allocate the costs of the accident?
		How would a party know when it would have to pay uncovered liabilities?
		How would a party know in what cases it was supposed to insure itself?

0.5 points

QUESTION 33

Huber discusses “the Founders,” meaning:

		The original theorists of ecology
		The Founding Fathers
		The founders of modern tort law
		The first moral theorists

0.5 points

QUESTION 34

A crucial case for Huber is the defective Shopsmith in:

		Posner
		Greeman
		Prosser
		Calabresi

0.5 points

QUESTION 35

Why does Dowie think that Ford’s cost-benefit analysis is a moral problem?

		It places a dollar value on human life.
		It is dishonest and includes lies about the Pinto's safety.
		It shows that Ford made the Pinto unsafe on purpose.
		Dowie doesn't actually think that Ford was morally wrong.

0.5 points

QUESTION 36

Werhane’s main point about the Pinto case is that:

		Ford was completely innocent of wrongdoing.
		A powerful narrative like Dowie’s article can bring the truth to a wider audience.
		Ford was completely responsible for the deaths caused by Pintos.
		A powerful narrative like Dowie’s article can skew our perception of the facts.

0.5 points

QUESTION 37

Thomson considers this rule: liability is to be shared between the actual harm-causer and anyone else who acted:

		Reasonably
		Justly
		Negligently
		Defensively

0.5 points

QUESTION 38

Thomson outlines three things a plaintiff must show in order to win his case. All of the following are discussed EXCEPT:

		The plantiff suffered from harm or loss.
		An act or omission of the defendant caused the harm or loss.
		The defendant is at fault in so acting or refraining from acting.
		None of the above.

0.5 points

QUESTION 39

Ciulla contends that the failure of leaders:

		Can be excused.
		Are often exaggerated.
		Seem more "extravagant" than those of nonleaders.
		Carry more "weight" than those of nonleaders.

0.5 points

QUESTION 40

Ciulla argues that American writers used to pay more attention to the moral virtues of leaders than to:

		Their chiseled features.
		Their personality traits.
		Their victories and successes.
		Their hopes and dreams.

0.5 points

QUESTION 41

Ciulla points out that while history portrays many leaders as winners, what is rarely questioned?

		The intentions of the leader.
		The ideological motives.
		The needs of the leader.
		All of the above.

0.5 points

QUESTION 42

Which is the area in which leaders must be more “meticulous,” according to Ciulla, than ordinary people?

		Consistency
		Truthfulness
		Legal Record
		Personal Relationships

0.5 points

QUESTION 43

We often characterize leaders, in Ciulla’s view, according to what?

		Their ability to stay out of conflict.
		Their ability to benefit the most people.
		Their ability to lead.
		Their ability to bring about change.

0.5 points

QUESTION 44

Robinhoodism is what, for Ciulla?

		Stealing from the poor and giving to the middle class.
		Leading a brand of social "rebels" motivated by social privileges.
		A type of Machiavellianism.
		All of the above.

0.5 points

QUESTION 45

When Machiavelli uses the metaphor of “the lion,” he is referring to what?

		Destroying the strategy of an opponent.
		Courage.
		Using fear as a weapon.
		Using love to motivate one's soldiers.

0.5 points

QUESTION 46

According to Machiavelli, when “a Prince is with his army, and has many soldiers under his command,” he needs a certain reputation to keep his command together. He needs a reputation for:

		Kindness
		"The Beast"
		Cruelty
		Morality

0.5 points

QUESTION 47

Is it better to be loved or feared, according to Machiavelli, and why?

		Feared, because that depends on the Prince and the people.
		Loved, because that depends on the Prince alone.
		Loved, because that depends on the Prince and the people.
		Feared, because that depends on the Prince alone.

0.5 points

QUESTION 48

Machiavelli insists that the Prince should “do his utmost to escape”:

		Harm
		Power
		Enemies
		Hatred

0.5 points

QUESTION 49

Machiavelli would argue that for the Prince, lying is:

		Never expedient.
		Always wrong.
		Always good.
		Sometimes necessary.

0.5 points

QUESTION 50

Ludwig and Longenecker use the story of David and Bathsheba as a lesson in what, as it applies to being in a position of leadership?

		Success
		Chastity
		Temptation
		Delegation