1
answer
12
watching
1,502
views
27 Feb 2018
Why do you think a debt instrument whose interest rate is charged periodically based on some market interest rate would be more suitable for a depository institution than a long-term debt instrument with a fixed interest rate?
In the long run, which is more advantageous to a firm? Should a firm take a risk with the floating rate or go with the known fixed rate and why?
Why do you think a debt instrument whose interest rate is charged periodically based on some market interest rate would be more suitable for a depository institution than a long-term debt instrument with a fixed interest rate?
In the long run, which is more advantageous to a firm? Should a firm take a risk with the floating rate or go with the known fixed rate and why?
Why do you think a debt instrument whose interest rate is charged periodically based on some market interest rate would be more suitable for a depository institution than a long-term debt instrument with a fixed interest rate?
In the long run, which is more advantageous to a firm? Should a firm take a risk with the floating rate or go with the known fixed rate and why?
Why do you think a debt instrument whose interest rate is charged periodically based on some market interest rate would be more suitable for a depository institution than a long-term debt instrument with a fixed interest rate?
In the long run, which is more advantageous to a firm? Should a firm take a risk with the floating rate or go with the known fixed rate and why?
Liked by loriefabon22
Lelia LubowitzLv2
2 Mar 2018