1
answer
0
watching
339
views
27 Jan 2018

Capital budgeting criteria: ethical considerations

A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.33 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $54 million, and the expected net cash inflows would be $18 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $19 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%.

Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55.
NPV $ million
IRR %

Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55.
NPV $ million
IRR %

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Bunny Greenfelder
Bunny GreenfelderLv2
28 Jan 2018

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in

Related questions

Related Documents

Weekly leaderboard

Start filling in the gaps now
Log in