Log in
Finance
1
answer
0
watching
149
views
4 Dec 2018

The management of Hinrichs corporate is concerned because survey data suggest that many potential customers do not buy vehicles due to quality concerns it is considering taking the bold step of increasing the length of its warranty from the industry standard of 3 years up to an unprecedented 10 years in an effort to increase confidence in its quality you are a financial consultant for Hinrichs corporation discuss the business as well as accounting implications of this move to the management

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
149
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Jean Keeling
Jean KeelingLv2
5 Dec 2018

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related questions

Jane Smith, CFA, has recently joined Zero Asset Management, Inc. (Zero) as a board member. Since Smith is also outside council for Zero, she is already very familiar with Zero’s operations and expects to begin contributing good ideas right away. Zero is a publicly traded investment management firm that historically focused on mutual fund management. Although there is current market opportunity to add a new type of mutual fund, the board recently decided against adding the fund. Instead, the board decided to expand its business to include a hedge fund operation within the existing corporation. Bill Week, CEO of Zero, has publicly stated that he is willing to bet the company’s future on hedge fund management. Week is the founder of Zero, as well as chairman of the board, and maintains a controlling interest in the company. Like the rest of Zero, the firm’s new hedge fund is quantitatively driven and index based. The fund has been set up in a separate office with new systems so that the analysts and managers can create a unique hedge fund culture. Trading and execution are the only operations that remain with Zero. The fund is run by one of Zero’s most successful portfolio managers. Smith learns that although none of the board members sit on other companies’ boards, most have at one point or another worked at Zero and so they are very familiar with Zero’s operations. A board member has attempted to make the health insurance and retirement concerns of the board members an agenda item, without success to date. Smith eagerly anticipates the next board meeting as they are always in a luxurious setting. At the board meeting, Smith asks a number of questions about Zero’s corporate gov- ernance system. The board becomes concerned by Smith’s questions and decides to hire an independent consultant to review their corporate governance responsibilities. The consultant starts his analysis by stating that a corporate governance systetem relies upon checks and bal- ances among managers, directors, and investors. Smith asks if Zero has the proper systems in place. The consultant says that he has looked at conflicts of interest and has one more area to review in order to verify that the board is meeting its major objectives. Concerned about the company’s stock price, Smith asks the consultant what work he has done concerning Zero’s corporate disclosures for investment professionals. The consultant indicates that he has reviewed Zero’s regulatory filings for clear and complete information, as well as the com-pany’s policies regarding related party transactions.

9. All of the following indicate Zero’s board’s lack of independence except:

A. personal relationships.

B. service of the outside counsel as a board member.

C. lack of interlocking directorships.

10. Which of the following is the most effective action for the board to take to address their oversight responsibilities concerning the hedge fund’s proxy voting?

A. Establish corporate values and governance structure for the company.

B. Establish long-term strategic objectives that are met and fully complied with.

C. Perform adequate training so that employees are able to perform their duties.

11. Which of the following omissions best describes a corporate governance shortcoming of Zero’s board of directors? The board’s failure to:

A. address the potential conflicts of interest between managing the firm’s hedge fund and its mutual fund business.

B. meet the market opportunity for a new kind of mutual fund.

C. establish the hedge fund operation in a separate corporation.

12. Given that Zero’s directors all previously worked at the company, which of the following would you recommend for a more effective system of corporate governance?

A. Ensure that assets are used efficiently and productively and in the best interests of investors and stakeholders.

B. Eliminate or mitigate conflicts of interest among stakeholders, particulularly between managers and shareholders

. C. Identify and measure accountabilities for the performance of the board’s responsibilities.

13. Which of the following best describes the objectives of Zero’s board that the consultant has not yet reviewed? The board should ensure:

A. that the assets of the company are used efficiently and productively and in the best interests of the investors and other stakeholders.

B. that material foreseeable risk factors are addressed and considered.

C. compliance with applicable laws and take into account the interest of stakeholders.

14. Which of the following is the most critical activity that an analyst can engage in to assess the quality of the corporate governance system at Zero, among those that the consultant did not review?

A. Look for vague references to off-balance-sheet or insider information.

B. Identify the responsiveness of the board to shareholder proxy votes.

C. Evaluate the quality and extent of financial information provided to investors.

Derivative

Vanguard High Yield Corporate Fund
Materials
• Website information (23/05/2016)
https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/snapshot?FundId=0029&FundIntExt=INT
• Summary Prospectus (27/05/2015)
• Prospectus (27/05/2015)
Anakin’s Job
In May 2016, Anakin leaves his job in Hollywood and returned to the finance industry. It is his
first love after all and the industry appears to be picking up again after the credit crunch of
2007-2008. He applies to be the risk analyst to the fund manager of the Vanguard High Yield
Corporate Fund as his quantitative training positions him well for a job that requires ever more
numerical and computational skills over the years. His solid background in applied analytics
in business management and humble demeanour help him clinch the post without much
difficulty.
The Vanguard Group is an American investment company that has approximately USD 3
trillion in asset-under-management. It is founded in 1975 by John Bogle who created the first
index fund (tied to the S&P 500 index) in the process. After an initial lull, the index grew
rapidly along with the bull market of the 1980s. The Group has since added various financial
services and products to its core business, particularly the ETFs.
Anakin is tasked by the fund manager to become thoroughly familiar with the structure of the
fund as is documented by files provided under “Materials”. After that, he is to assess the
exposure of the High Yield Corporate Fund to risks in the market. He seeks the opinion of
Darth who is a veteran market analyst with the Vanguard Guard group for over 20 years.
Outlook
Darth has this to say about the economy and fixed income market:
" The US economy is improving steadily. It will not be long before the Fed decides to raise
interest rates. Once the Fed restarts the regime of rising rates, it will about 2 years for the yield
curve to rise by 100 basis points.
Consequently, in the more stringent economic environment, companies of lower credit
qualities, namely those of Caa and below, are expected to have their credit standing further
eroded. There is a 25% chance that a Caa-rated issuer may go into default and another 25%
chance that it may be downgraded to C.
The Greek debt problem, though much stabilized than before, is still a matter of grave concern
for the Eurozone. Expect the euro to depreciate against the dollar over the course of the next 6
months. A fall of 500 pips will not be a surprise. "
Assume Anakins’ role and answer the following questions. Questions 1 and 2 concern the
Financial Environment. The Environment at large provides the context and sets the constraints
within which financial decisions are weighed and taken. Questions 3 and 4 pertain to the task
that Anakin needs to complete.

Question 1
Describe the types of mutual funds that can be found in the market in a concise and systematic
manner, suitable for presenting to a group of investors who are high net worth and impatient.
(25 marks)
Question 2
Collect data (e.g. from the internet and/or Eikon) to plot the term structures of bond yields.
Each term structure describes the state of the fixed income market for bonds of the credit quality
corresponding to that curve. The different term structures span the space of bonds across credit
qualities and maturities.
Analyse the states of these markets relative to the shape of the curves. Compare and contrast
your analysis with current market views.
Explain your steps, present your answers and quote your sources clearly.
(25 marks)
Question 3
To better understand the structure of the fund, answer the following questions:
(a) Describe the composition of the fund.
(b) What are the risks faced by the fund according to the prospectus? Analyse the nature of
the portfolio risk accordingly and comment on whether commodity price risk and equity
price risk matter to the fund management.
(c) Discuss the performance of the fund based on the financial numbers provided.
(d) Assess the quality of the management of the fund.
(25 marks)
Question 4
The fund is affected by changes in the financial markets. When interest rates rise, the value of
the portfolio falls. Occurrences that are flagged by the rating agency to be credit events can
result in the downgrading of credit rating of bond issuers. Bonds that denominated in foreign
currency are affected by fluctuations in the foreign exchange market.
(a) Analyse generally the need for hedging the various market risks for the fund.

Take into account Darth’s outlook. Address some of these risk concerns by answering the
following question:
(b) Suppose that in the coming 2 years, the prevailing interest rates are expected to go up
by 100 basis points and you are concerned. Show how you could hedge away the
interest rate risk by using an interest rate swap, assuming that the fund by may
represented by a single 5-year par bond on the $18.4 billion net assets with semi-annual
5% coupon payments starting from the current date.
In your explanation, you may assume a scenario in which a flat yield curve increases
uniformly across all terms by 25 basis points per half-a-year.
(c) Credit default swaps may be used to ameliorate credit risk. Appraise the use of such
option-like derivative instruments in managing the risk of the portfolio by explaining
how such instruments function.

IRJAF-Toruga Actions for 'IRJAF-Toruga'

Abstract This case study on project evaluation is applicable for beginning courses in corporate finance or finance strategy. Two alternative investment options are available to evaluate. Challenges are presented with the inclusion of equity, bank debt, and bonds in the capital structure. Each investment option need to be evaluated carefully and decision should be made on the basis of thorough analysis of the data available using various capital structure and capital budgeting techniques. Keywords: Beta, Corporate Finance, Cost of Capital, Internal Rate of Return, Net Present Value JEL Code: C10, G31, G32

Introduction

Brooks Hamilton recently accepted a job with Tortuga Fishing Equipment Company1 (Tortuga) in the company’s finance department. His first few assignments were fairly straightforward and Brooks relied on his background in both accounting and finance to get his career off to a great start. His manager, the company’s Chief Financial Officer (CFO) was impressed with his work and decided to put Brooks on a new assignment. The firm was embarking on a new project which would define its future over the upcoming years. Given the importance of the project and high degree of visibility with the firm’s senior management, Brooks was flattered to be asked to assist and eager to show that he was up to the task. The finance department was tasked with preparing an analysis to make a decision between two competing project plans which could very well decide the future of Tortuga in the competitive fishing equipment industry. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) wants to have an answer from finance and expects a thorough analysis very quickly.

The Company

Tortuga is an Islamorada, Florida based company specializing in manufacturing high-end fishing rods and reels. Tortuga was founded by a retired university professor who fished all of his life and wanted to create the best equipment possible to handle a variety of fishing conditions and fish species. He partnered with an engineer who ran a machine shop to produce some prototype reels and supplied these to commercial fishing captains as test market research. The equipment produced by Tortuga was a significant improvement over the current line available and orders were strong. Through the years, the company made some modest improvements to their original prototype and had become an industry leader. Tortuga’s products are used by tournament fishing teams around the world. Over the past decade, tournament fishing has grown to become a big business with corporate endorsements and prize money. This growth has made what was once a recreational vocation into a full-time profession for some anglers. The company recently launched an extensive research and development effort focused on a new flyrod and reel designed for one particular species of fish, the Atlantic Tarpon (Megalops atlanticus). Tarpon are long-lived fishes that migrate in the warmer climes of the Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico, and along the Atlantic Ocean coastlines. Although the fish can reach lengths of eight feet (~2.4 meters) and weights of 280 pounds (127 kilograms), they inhabit the shallow flats and exhibit acrobatic leaps when hooked. These traits make tarpon a popular game fish for anglers. Fishing gear needs to be sturdy to handle the power of these fish and Tortuga had developed products for this niche market which were allowing anglers to be successful in their angling pursuits. Recently, several sponsors had come together to launch competitive angling events called tournaments, where the best anglers vie to catch, and then release, the most and largest tarpon. Winners may receive up to $50,000 in a single weekend tournament and the difference between winning and losing could be a few pounds. With so much money at stake, tournament teams purchase the best gear available and are always looking for any competitive advantage with their equipment. Tortuga is looking to capitalize on this trend by offering a new line called the Tortuga Tarpon Classic. This new line incorporates the latest material and design improvements and is predicted to be the “gold standard” for all serious tournaments anglers. Tortuga plans to offer the Tortuga Tarpon Classic to recreational anglers as well to capture the growing demand by affluent anglers who want the same high-quality gear as the professionals.

Financial Information

Tortuga began with a modest amount of capital that the founder had managed to save during his years in academia. As the firm grew, its financing needs expanded as well. Through the years Tortuga had developed and maintained a strong relationship with a large bank which provided short-term working capital funds in the form of a revolving line of credit. When a funding need arose, Tortuga would draw from this line of credit and then repay the short-term draw as cash flowed back to Tortuga. The $200 million revolving line of credit currently has $25 million drawn at an interest rate of 3-month Libor plus 350 basis points2. The remaining $175 million credit line can be assumed to have no fees associated with it3. Brooks looks up the most recent 3- month U.S. dollar Libor rate and sees that it is 1.50%. Long-term financing was also in place in two forms. After several years of revenue and earnings growth, Tortuga issued five million shares of common stock at an issue price of $10 per share. The firm used this $50 million in funding to increase production lines and build a global presence by opening an additional manufacturing facility in Panama. Brooks finds the current price per share for Tortuga to be $16. Two years ago, Tortuga issued a 10-year bond for $50 million face value. Each $1,000 par bond carries a coupon of 8.5%. The bond pays interest semi-annually and is currently trading in the market at 102.50 as a percent of par. The company has a 34% corporate tax rate. The firm calculates its required return on equity with the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) using a 4.0% historical Treasury rate for the risk-free rate and 6.0% as the historical market risk premium4. CAPM = Risk-free rate + beta (Market Risk Premium) The annual stock returns versus the market are shown in Figure 1 below for the past 10 years. Beta is calculated by regressing Tortuga stock returns on the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 returns. There are a variety of methods for calculating beta. Brooks could find beta by regressing five years of weekly Tortuga returns of the S&P 500. He could use five years of monthly returns or two years of weekly returns. Each of these is a valid sample period. One well-known data source provides an “adjusted” beta which is determined by first calculating a “raw” beta by regressing two years of weekly security returns on the market. This is then adjusted by taking 2/3 of the raw beta plus 1/3 of one. This adjusts the beta to be closer to one, since beta is not stationary and should naturally move towards one through time as a firm expands. Brooks only has 10 years of annual data available at the time and decides to conduct the analysis with this information to get a quick response. He will check his result with more data points before submitting his final report to the CFO.

Figure 1 Returns on Tortuga Stock versus the Standard & Poor 500 Year Tortuga Return S&P 500 Return Year Tortuga Return S&P 500 Return 1 12 7 2 22 16 3 -2 -3 4 14 9 5 9 8 6 19 21 7 16 17 8 -10 -5 9 7 9 10 12 14 Source: Author After Brooks calculates beta he employs formula (1) above along with the risk-free rate and market risk premium to determine the cost of equity. The firm’s weighted average cost of capital is a function of its equity market capitalization, cost of equity, short- and long-term debt amounts and costs, and the tax rate. Using formula (2) below, Brooks can find the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC). WACC = Rd * D + Re*(E/D+E) where: WACC = weighted average cost of capital Rd = Cost of Debt Rd1 (1-marginal tax rate) Rd1= Company’s before tax rate D= weighted percent of debt E= weighted percent of equity Re = Cost of equity Rf +B*(Rm-Rf) Rf= risk free rate B= Beta, the owners will need to calculate beta Rm= equity risk premium Tortuga Tarpon Classic The company has two separate research teams working on the project and they develop two distinctly different fishing combinations. The two rod and reel combinations are test marketed with guides and past tournament champions and demand forecasts are determined. Most fishing gear has a relatively short life due to continual product innovation. Manufacturing of the two combinations is estimated to require an upfront cost of $5 million to retool the machine shop. The process for manufacturing the two combinations differ and ongoing variable costs are not the same. The net cash flows for the entire ten year expected life of the product is shown in Table 2 as Project A and Project B (all figures are $thousands of net cash flow). Project A focuses on hand tooled fishing equipment which results in a more labor intensive process, but also allows for personalized features for customers. The price charged for customization offset the slower hand tooling process to generate substantial net cash flows. Part of the upfront $5 million includes the costs of training more machinists in the art of hand tooling, which is similar to watch making but with a few less moving parts. Project A is anticipated to generate lower cash flows in the early years due to the length of time required to get machinists who are adept at hand tooling to customer specifications. In fact, during the first year there will be continued expenses to attain these skills which causes year one net cash flows to be negative. Over time the cash flows increase as more machinists gain proficiency. The project is expected to experience lower cash flows towards the end of its life due to market saturation. Due to the quality of the reels, they are built to last and seldom fail or wear out. Technological obsolescence is certain although Tortuga will be investing cash flows into research and development to launch the next generation at the conclusion of the Tortuga Tarpon Classic life cycle. Project B employs a mechanized approach to large scale production of standardized equipment. Although the approach does not allow for personalization, it does allow Tortuga to build its inventory quickly and capture positive net cash flows immediately. The upfront expense is almost completely devoted to tooling equipment procurement and the number of units produced will be much higher and at lower price points than the approach of Project A. At the end of both projects life it is assumed that there will be zero salvage value as the pace of innovation will require a complete re-tooling for the next generation and the useful life of the equipment will have been fully realized. Brooks realizes that he will need to calculate the firm’s cost of capital discount rate and apply this to the cash flow projections of both projects. He recalls all of the assignments he completed at university and is thankful to have been so well-prepared for this task. He gets a cup of coffee, sits down at his desk, and gets to work. Figure 2 Project Net Cash Flows for Tortuga Fishing Equipment ($thousands) Year Project A Project B 1 -900 950 2 200 950 3 900 950 4 1800 950 5 2500 950 6 2500 950 7 1800 950 8 1200 950 9 800 950 10 200 950 Source: Author Since Brooks is new to his role, you have been asked to review his work and assess the financial viability of the projects. Given the importance of this decision you are helping to make sure the firm makes the right choice. Notes: 1. Fictitious company created to illustrate corporate finance principles. 2. Libor is an acronym for London Interbank Offered Bank, which is a standard floating interest rate benchmark for credit facilities. A basis point is equal to 1/100th of 1%. One percent is 100 basis points. 3. Typically a bank will charge a facility fee for the entire credit facility, $200 million in this case and an interest rate based on utilization. We assume no facility fee for simplicity. 4. The risk-free rate is determined based on the geometric average of the long-term Treasury. The market risk premium is calculated based on the difference between the geometric return on the Standard & Poor’s 500 index and the long-term Treasury.

Specific Questions 1. Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model, what is the required rate of return on equity, E (cost of equity) for Tortuga? 2. what are the weights of equity and debt in the capital structure? (Rd & Re) 3. Using the information provided, what is the firm’s weighted average cost of capital (WACC)? 4. What are the net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and Payback Periods for Projects A & B? 5. What decision rules will you use to help Tortuga reach a decision? 6. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of the evaluation tools?

Related Documents

FIN 305 Lecture Notes - Lecture 3: Kmt2A, No Introduction, Profit Margin
plumwoodchuck483
FIN 301 Chapter Notes - Chapter 3: Takeover, Keiretsu, Leveraged Buyout
yellowminnow102
FIN111 Lecture Notes - Lecture 11: Market Risk, Scenario Analysis, Systematic Risk
amaranthyak49

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Finance 370,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in