🏷️ LIMITED TIME OFFER: GET 20% OFF GRADE+ YEARLY SUBSCRIPTION →
Log in
Statistics
1
answer
0
watching
47
views

Please comment on if you agree or disagree with this paragraph and explain why. In order to evaluate the 3 different offices cycle times you will use the one-way ANOVA test. You would have to assume that the samples would have normal distribution. First you would then create a null-hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis. How would that be if there is no significant difference in the average cycle time of the offices and H1 that there is a significant difference in the average cycle times of the offices. You would then collect the times for all 3 offices and calculate the grand total and class total of the times. You then find the SS or sum of squares between the classes and the DF or degrees of freedom. Then the mean of the SS, then lastly find the F-ratio. After these steps you could put together you report to give to your leader, for them to decide what action to take. thank you

Watch
1
answer
0
watching
47
views

For unlimited access to Homework Help, a Homework+ subscription is required.

Unlock all answers

Get 1 free homework help answer.
Get unlimited access
Already have an account? Log in
Share

Related textbook solutions

Introductory Statistics
OER Edition, 2013
Openstax
ISBN: 9781938168208

Related questions

Hypothesis testing with ANOVA opinions about whether caffeine enhances test performance differ. You design a study to test the impact of drinks with different caffeine contents on students' test-taking abilities. You choose 21 students at random from your introductory psychology course to participate in your study. You randomly assign each student to one of three drinks, each with a different caffeine concentration, such that there are seven students assigned to each drink. You then give each of them a plain capsule containing the precise quantity of caffeine that would be consumed in their designated drink and have them take an arithmetic test 15 minutes later.

The students receive the following arithmetic test scores:

  Cola Black Tea Coffee  
Caffeine Content (mg/oz) 2.9 5.9 13.4  
  85 85 92 ∑X2 = 147,641
  86 89 87 G = 1,755
  82 82 80 N = 21
  75 75 89 k = 3
  66 88 96  
  78 76 83  
  87 82 92  
  T1 = 559 T2 = 559 T3 = 559  
  SS1 = 338.86 SS2 = 338.86 SS3 = 338.86  
  n1 = 7 n2 = 7 n3 = 7  
  M1 = 79.8571 M2 = 79.8571 M3 = 79.8571  

1.) You plan to use an ANOVA to test the impact of drinks with different caffeine contents on students' test-taking abilities. What is the null hypothesis?

(a) The population mean test score for the cola population is different from the population mean test score for the black tea population.

(b) The population mean test scores for all three treatments are equal.

(c) The population mean test scores for all three treatments are different.

(d) The population mean test scores for all three treatments are not all equal.

 

2.) Calculate the degrees of freedom and the variances for the following ANOVA table:

Source SS df MS
Between - - -
Within 702.28 - -
Total 973.14 -  

 

The formula for the F-ratio is:

 

 

3.) Using words, the formula of the F-ratio can be written as:

 

 

4.) Using the data from the ANOVA table given, the F-ratio can be written as:

 

5.) Calculate for F-ratio:

 

 

6.) At the level of significance, what is your conclusion?

(a)You can reject the null hypothesis; you do not have enough evidence to say that caffeine affects test performance.

(b)You cannot reject the null hypothesis; caffeine does appear to affect test performance.

(c)You cannot reject the null hypothesis; you do not have enough evidence to say that caffeine affects test performance.

(d)You can reject the null hypothesis; caffeine does appear to affect test performance.

(14 marks) Fortune magazine publishes a list of the world’s billionaires each year. We will examine the top 97 of the 1992 list. Their wealth, age, and geographic location (Asia, Europe, Middle East, United States, and Other) are reported. Wealth is a right-skewed variable, so we will consider the natural logarithm log wealth to be the response and will see if age and geographic location are predictors.
(a) (2 marks) Let
Ebe a variable that is 1 if the person is from Europe and 0 otherwise,
Mbe a variable that is 1 if the person is from the Middle East and 0 otherwise,
Obe a variable that is 1 if the person is from the “Other” region and 0 otherwise,
and
Ube a variable that is 1 if the person is from the United States and 0 otherwise.
State a linear model for the mean of log wealth that includes age and the above 4
geographic variables. Call this the full model.
(b) (5 marks) The SSY for these data is 28.3351 and the SSE from fitting the full model
is 27.0461. Use this information to construct an ANOVA table. Your table should
include columns for Source, df, SS, MS and F, and should include rows for the model
(full model), residual and total.
(c) (2 marks) In addition to the full model, the reduced model that includes only an
intercept and age is fit. What is the null hypothesis being considered by fitting these
two models? (Refer to quantities defined in your model.)
(d) (3 marks) The SSM from the reduced model is 59.7. Calculate an F-statistic to test the hypothesis of part (c). State the degrees of freedom for the F-distribution
you would compare this statistic to. (You do not need to calculate the p-value or actually test the hypothesis.)
(e) (1 mark) Using terminology from class, name the kind of Ftest that the statistic in part (d) corresponds to.
(f) (1 mark) If the null model for these data is compared to the model that includes an
intercept and age, what are the results?

QUESTION 1What is the purpose of post hoc tests? Under what circumstances are post hoc tests not needed or appropriate?

a. Under what circumstances is ANOVA a more appropriate statistical technique to use than a t test for independent samples? Please provide an example(s) to support your answer. (2 marks)

b.  (2 marks)

c. In testing the difference between group means, how are between group and within group variability related to each other? Provide an example to support your answer. (2 marks)

QUESTION 2

a. If a two-factor ANOVA results in a significant main effect for factor A and a significant AxB interaction, explain why you should be cautious in interpreting the effect of factor A. (1 mark)

b. For the following research situations what would be your main effects and interaction effect. If there was a significant interaction effect what would that mean? (please be as clear as possible in your explanation):

  1. A researcher hypothesizes that the effect of alcohol consumption on one’s motor skills depends on the person’s weight (underweight, normal, overweight), but that this may differ for men versus women. (2 marks)

  2. A teacher is interested in seeing how attending class and reading the assigned chapters is related to her students’ performance on tests. She assesses each student in terms of how often they attend class (rarely, sometimes, regularly) and how often they read the assigned chapters (rarely, sometimes, regularly). (2 marks)

1

QUESTION 3

Ethel is interested in two methods of note-taking strategies and the effect of these strategies on the overall GPAs of college freshmen. She believes that men would benefit most from Method 1, while women would benefit most from Method 2. After obtaining 30 men and 30 women volunteers in freshmen orientation, she randomly assigns 10 men and 10 women to Method 1, 10 men and 10 women to Method 2, and 10 men and 10 women to a control condition. During the first month of the spring semester individuals in the two note-taking method groups receive daily instruction on the particular note-taking method to which they were assigned. The control group receives no note-taking instruction. Fall and spring GPAs for all participants are recorded and a score that is the difference between the spring and fall semester GPAs is calculated.

Below are the results from running a two-way ANOVA. Please answer the following:

  1. What is the dependent variable? (0.5 marks)

  2. What are the independent variables (factors)? (0.5 marks)

  3. What is the research question(s) being addressed? (1 mark)

  4. What does the descriptive statistics (graphical) tell us about the effects under study?

    (1 mark)

  5. What assumptions are being tested in the R output? Are these assumptions met? Please

    provide statistical evidence. (2 marks)

  6. What effects are being tested in the R output? (1 mark)

  7. What does output from the ANOVA table tell us? (1 mark)

  8. What type of follow-up analyses was conducted and why? Please interpret. (2 marks)

2

: Men
: Method1

      median
coef.var

0.300

0.469

: Women
: Method1

      median
coef.var

0.150

0.496

: Men
: Method2

      median
coef.var

0.275

0.027

: Women
: Method2

      median
coef.var

0.600

0.629

: Men
: Control

      median
coef.var

0.175

mean 0.335

mean 0.170

mean 0.305

mean 0.640

mean 0.165

mean 0.105

skew.2SE
   0.408

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

var 0.052

var 0.033

var 0.037

var 0.032

var 0.022

var 0.021

normtest.W
     0.936

std.dev
  0.229

0.682
    skewness

1.076
    skewness

0.630
    skewness

0.072

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

normtest.p 0.830 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

skew.2SE
   0.342

kurtosis
  -0.645

kurt.2SE
  -0.242

normtest.W
     0.964

0.058

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

std.dev
  0.183

normtest.p 0.096 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

skew.2SE
   0.361

kurtosis
  -1.363

kurt.2SE
  -0.511

normtest.W
     0.869

0.061

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

std.dev
  0.192

normtest.p 0.857 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

0.278
    skewness

0.904
    skewness

skew.2SE
  -0.124

kurtosis
  -1.096

kurt.2SE
  -0.411

normtest.W
     0.979

-0.171

: Women
: Control

      median
coef.var

0.100

1.392
    skewness

0.560

0.046

kurtosis
  -0.759

0.105

kurt.2SE
  -0.284

   std.dev
     0.146

normtest.p
     0.512

skew.2SE
   0.019

kurtosis
  -1.443

kurt.2SE
  -0.541

normtest.W
     0.967

skew.2SE
   0.458

kurtosis
  -0.770

kurt.2SE
  -0.289

normtest.W
     0.906

0.056

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

std.dev
  0.178

normtest.p 0.254 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      std.dev
                                                                        0.149

normtest.p 0.958 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

0.047

SE.mean CI.mean.0.95

0.164

0.131

0.137

0.127

0.107

3

> leveneTest(gpa$gpaimpr~gpa$gender, data=gpa,center=mean)

Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = mean) Df F value Pr(>F)

group 1 7.09 0.01* 58

---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 > leveneTest(gpa$gpaimpr~method, data=gpa,center=mean) Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = mean)

      Df F value Pr(>F)
group  2    1.94   0.15

57

> #running Levene's test for assumption of HOV (INTERACTION EFFECT)
> leveneTest(gpa$gpaimpr, interaction(gpa$gender,gpa$method),center=mean) Levene's Test for Homogeneity of Variance (center = mean)

      Df F value Pr(>F)
group  5    0.57   0.72

54

Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F) gender 1 0.020 0.020 0.61 0.43753

method 2 1.174 0.587 17.81 1.1e-06 *** gender:method 2 0.695 0.348 10.54 0.00014 *** Residuals 54 1.780 0.033
---

Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

4

gender        0.0055
method        0.3200
gender:method 0.1894

0.011
0.397
0.281

eta.sq eta.sq.part

#selecting only Method1, run ANOVA, then follow-up tests

  Tukey multiple comparisons of means
    95% family-wise confidence level

Fit: aov(formula = gpaimpr ~ gender, data = gpaMethod1)
$`gender`
Women-Men -0.165 -0.3594851  0.02948506    0.0915581

diff        lwr        upr     p adj

#selecting only Method2, run ANOVA, then follow-up tests

  Tukey multiple comparisons of means
    95% family-wise confidence level

Fit: aov(formula = gpaimpr ~ gender, data = gpaMethod2)
$`gender`
Women-Men 0.335 0.161153 0.508847   0.000754

diff      lwr      upr    p adj

5

Weekly leaderboard

Home
Homework Help 3,900,000
Statistics 10,000
Start filling in the gaps now
Log in