0
answers
0
watching
235
views
26 Nov 2019
I understood all the steps that were used to integrate andsolvethis problem. However, my initial idea was to solve thisusingθf = θi + vt+1/2at2. This shouldwork outto θf = 0 + 0 + 1/2(10 +6t)t2. Icalculated this to be 272, which is clearlydifferent than theintegrated result. Am I missing somethingobvious?
I understood all the steps that were used to integrate andsolvethis problem. However, my initial idea was to solve thisusingθf = θi + vt+1/2at2. This shouldwork outto θf = 0 + 0 + 1/2(10 +6t)t2. Icalculated this to be 272, which is clearlydifferent than theintegrated result. Am I missing somethingobvious?
