jayprashantbhilala

Step:1

Find ONE general-interest article on the internet (from .com, net, or do NOT use websites like the CDC, NHI or similar) that contains a negative view of MSG.

Look for ONE peer-reviewed journal article on MSG. If the internet article cites (or links) a research publication from a scholarly journal, you may locate and use it. Alternatively, you can find a peer-reviewed article using Google Scholar.

Step2:

1.BRIEFLY introduce the difference and/or similarity of claims you have found between the two sources. (cite and clearly signal the source (in the article__) so we know "which" is
"which").

2.Did the online article seem reliable at first glance? Have you detected any biases or lack of sources in the statements? Has your opinion changed AFTER screening the website using the pdf located in step 1? Why?

3.Consider the domain of analysis introduced in the pdf (authority, currency, functionality, accuracy, and objectivity).
What is the website source missing? Did you find the pdf useful?

What are the basic components of a cell and their functions?