majidkhanlucifer

An aquarium 2m long, 3m wide, and 1m deep is full of water. Find the work needed to pump all the water out of the aquarium. The density of water is 1000 kg/m³. You will need to replace g, the acceleration due to gravity, with the value 9.8.

Work = _______ j

An aquarium 2 m long, 1m wide, and 1m deep is full of water. Find the work needed to pump half od the water out of the aquarium . ( use the fact that the density od waters 1000kg/m^3.)

I need help solving both parts. Please show your work if possible.

An aquarium 5 m long, 4 m wide, and 3 m deep is full of water. Find the work needed to pump half of the water out of the aquarium. (Use the fact that the density of water is 1000 kg/m3, and use 9.8 m/s2 for g.)

An aquarium 5 m long, 4 m wide, and 3 m deep is full of water. Find the work needed to pump half of the water out of the aquarium. (Use the fact that the density of water is 1000 kg/m3, and use 9.8 m/s2 for g.)

The readings center on the American economy after World War Il; this time frame, roughly from 1945 to 1973, has been referred to as the "Golden Age" of American capitalism. In regards to this task

1 - How specifically did the US government try to increase labor's purchasing power at this time?

An aquarium 8 m long, 2 m wide and 3 m deep is full of water. Findthe work needed to pump half of the water out of theaquarium?
(The acceleration due to gravity is 9.8 and the density of water is1000 .)
note: show me how u did it, please?

Intigration of secx

Read the following passages and answer the following questions for each one:

1. What is the phenomenon being explained?

2. What theories are advanced to explain the phenomenon?

3. Which theory seems the most plausible and why? (Use the criteria of ad-equacy.)

4. Regarding the most credible theory, is there a test implication men-tioned? If so, what is it? If not, what would be a good test implication for the theory?

5. What test results would convince you to change your mind about your preferred theory?

PASSAGE 1

"In the past several years, a researcher named David Oates has been advocating his discovery of a most interesting phenomenon. Oates claims that backward messages are hidden unintentionally in all human speech. The messages can be understood by recording normal speech and playing it in reverse.... [According to Oates] 'Any thought, any emotion, any motive that any person has can appear backwards in human speech. The implications are mind boggling because reverse speech opens up the Truth'... To our knowledge there is not one empirical investigation of reverse speech in any peer-reviewed journal. If reverse speech did exist it would be, at the very least, a noteworthy scientific discovery. However, there are no data to support the existence of reverse speech or Oates's theories about its implications."