LAWS203 Study Guide - Final Guide: Singtel, Australia Act 1986, Consumer Protection

131 views13 pages
24 Jul 2018
School
Department
Course
Professor

Document Summary

Operations pty ltd v tpc: accc v cadbury schweppes, should not be unnecessarily wide, and should not restrain conduct which has not been found to be misleading or deceptive: campomar sociedad, limitada v nike. Withdrawal of product from market: compensation. Society: there must be a real dispute" between the parties s 21(1) Accc (. 61 m), accc v tpg internet pty ltd (no: ( m) Same factors as for civil penalties awarded for breach of anti-competitive provisions: Whether contravening conduct systematic, deliberate or covert. Size and financial position of the corporation specific and general deterrence. Whether contravention arose from conduct of senior level of management. Existence of internal compliance program and educational programmes. Position of influence and importance within the industry. If person does not comply, accc must commence proceedings in usual way, and the court might impose a higher penalty: s. Must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: accc v ascot four (,000) contravention of s.