70109 Study Guide - Final Guide: 18 Months, Prior Consistent Statements And Prior Inconsistent Statements
Document Summary
Don(cid:859)t use this section only hear to show old cases that applied this version of s 60 before the amendments to this section. Amended act: s60 exception: evidence relevant for a non-hearsay. The admission might still be admissible under section 81 as an exception to the hearsa(cid:455) rule if it is (cid:862)first-ha(cid:374)d(cid:863) hearsa(cid:455): see section 82. Always consider s 136 limiting to one use. Lee v the queen (1998) 195 clr 594. Lee attempted an armed robbery, a short time later police officers see lee in the street with calin and both are arrested. A short time after that calin makes a police statement that says lee said he (cid:858)fired t(cid:449)o shots, i did a jo(cid:271) a(cid:374)d the other gu(cid:455) (cid:449)as (cid:449)ith (cid:373)e (cid:271)ailed out(cid:859). Lee is o(cid:374) trial a(cid:374)d duri(cid:374)g cali(cid:374)(cid:859)s e(cid:454)a(cid:373)i(cid:374)atio(cid:374) i(cid:374) (cid:272)hief he sa(cid:455)s that he sa(cid:449) lee i(cid:374) the street a(cid:374)d the(cid:455) discussed an unpaid debt however denied other parts of the conversation.
